Show your receipts.

You can follow the source.

Each case separates the cultural reference, the characters’ situation and the factual explanation. A cartoon, a clip or a character’s opinion can start a question. The linked sources support the explanation.

For legal and policy questions, we identify the rule and the place it applies. For a public statement, we distinguish what someone said from what the evidence establishes. The source file explains what a link supports and where uncertainty remains.

The English and Spanish explanations are written to preserve the same claim, scope and uncertainty. A conversational version should make the idea clearer without changing what a rule or source says. Our definitions help with the case; the linked original remains the source for the rule.

Cases offer general education. An individual situation may need qualified advice. This edition has not received independent subject-expert review.

A perspective is a starting point.

Gia, Mateo and their friends bring different experiences into a scene. They can miss context, disagree or change their minds. Their preferred outcome is not the answer key.

We ask who is affected, whose account is missing and what evidence would change an explanation. No character or learner is asked to represent an entire community.

Something doesn’t add up?

Use the question notebook to record the case, the claim and a source to check with your teacher. Start the title with “Correction” so the purpose is clear. Please leave private records and other people’s personal details out.

A substantive correction should identify what changed and why on the affected case. We do not promise an immediate response, and there is no independent review team behind this edition.

The crew is part of the story.

Gia, Mateo and seven neighbors are everyday people working things out together. The companions start the conversation: Pauta asks about the rule, Lupa asks for the original, Duda questions an assumption, Onda asks who is affected, Nexo notices a connection and Voz asks how to tell someone else. The companions prompt; the crew and the learner investigate.

The cast and professional guest guides are fictional. A guest’s title belongs to the story; it does not mean a real professional has endorsed or reviewed the case. The artwork and films use generation tools with editing and visual review. Those tools do not verify the educational claims.

Useful tools. Clear relationships.

Adobe and Apple products appear as optional ways to make something from a case. Their inclusion does not imply sponsorship, free access or an organizational partnership. Paper, plain text and spoken responses remain valid ways to participate.

No, Pero Why? is created by Nasaiah Algarin. The mission, equity commitments and creator note are on the project page.