Back to cases
Case 9Voice & participation4 min

Your ballot is more local than your feed.

Dec is looking beyond the biggest headline. Anika, Mari and Nexo help him find the decisions that actually reach his ballot.

In the conversationJordyRafaAnikaNexo
Jordy, Rafa and Anika set up a campus organization table.

Start close to home.

Jordy, Rafa and Anika set up a campus organization table.

Jordy is with you

I don’t need someone to pick for me. I need to know what I’m deciding and where to check it.

Official U.S. election information

Start with your state or territory at Vote.gov

This case starts with a real tool, not a fictional election. Use the official information for your location before researching the choices on your ballot.

Open the original reference

A moment with the cast

Read the scene description

Anika turns her notebook toward you, Mari lowers her zine and Dec puts down his phone. Nexo follows the group’s attention toward the table. A silent animated scene.

Open the 4K film

At the library desk, the names are only the start.

Which office can do the thing you care about?

Hear what matters to each person. Choose a question. Notice what their answer adds, then check it against the case materials.

Two people to hear from. Start with either one.

Put their perspectives together

Keep the office, authority and voting process separate. The next step should point a person to their own official information, not a copied deadline from another place.

A person’s account explains their perspective. It still needs checking where it makes a factual claim.

Follow the explanation

Bring a companion into this.

Six ways to get unstuck
DudaFind the question

What assumption about a deadline or eligibility rule would you check before passing it on?

Try your first take
PautaCheck who decides

Which election office governs the place and election being discussed?

Open the source file
LupaFollow the evidence

Record the official source, place, election and check date. Separate facts from commentary.

Check the original
OndaConsider the people

What practical questions might a first-time participant have, and who might your chosen channel miss?

Consider another view
NexoLook at the bigger picture

If the proposed fix is clearer information, which participation barriers does that address and which remain?

Read the explanation
VozMake a next move

Create a nonpartisan source guide for someone checking a local election. Use official information for their jurisdiction and date; keep candidate preference out of the guide.

Build your response

Follow the question.

A sample ballot shows which contests and measures you will encounter. A voter guide can provide background or arguments. They serve different purposes. Start by finding the ballot for your actual address. USA.gov explains the difference.

Registration rules, deadlines and voting options vary by state and territory. Vote.gov directs you to the relevant official information. If you are under 18, check preregistration and age rules for your location; some states have exceptions for certain 17-year-olds in primaries. Do not assume a friend’s rules apply to you. Check Vote.gov’s age guide.

Try the situation

Your address helps determine your ballot. Your feed does not.

A sample ballot tells you which contests and measures apply to a particular election and location. A voter guide explains or recommends choices. Keep those functions separate, even when the guide comes from someone you trust.

Start with official eligibility and registration information for your own state or territory. If you moved for school, ask the election office which address and process apply to your situation. Do not copy a friend’s deadlines or assume student status establishes eligibility. You can compare candidates’ or measures’ actual proposals with reliable reporting without asking this platform to decide for you. If you are not eligible to vote, community and campus participation offer other places to learn and contribute.

Sample ballot
A preview of the contests and measures for an election and location.
Registration
The process for being listed to vote where registration is required.
Jurisdiction
The geographic or legal area a particular authority covers.

Una papeleta de muestra indica qué elecciones y medidas corresponden a una elección y un lugar específicos. Una guía electoral explica o recomienda opciones. Son funciones distintas, aunque confíes en quien preparó la guía.

Empieza por la información oficial de elegibilidad e inscripción de tu estado o territorio. Si te mudaste por estudios, consulta a la oficina electoral qué dirección y proceso corresponden a tu situación. No copies los plazos de una amistad ni supongas que ser estudiante establece elegibilidad. Puedes comparar las propuestas y consultar periodismo confiable sin que esta plataforma decida por ti. Si no puedes votar, también hay espacios comunitarios y estudiantiles donde aprender y participar.

Papeleta de muestra
Vista previa de las elecciones y medidas correspondientes.
Inscripción electoral
Proceso para figurar como votante donde se requiere inscripción.
Jurisdicción
Ámbito geográfico o jurídico de una autoridad.
An invented situation to think through

You moved recently. A friend sends their sample ballot and says, “Just use this one.” What would you do?

Choose an approach. You can explore every response.

Your turn. Make it useful.

Create a nonpartisan source guide for someone checking a local election. Use official information for their jurisdiction and date; keep candidate preference out of the guide.

Before you call it done: Can a reader locate the official office and identify which details still need a current check?

How the seven fields work together here

These questions shape the same assignment. Work through them in plain language; you don’t need seven separate essays.

Public relations
What practical questions might a first-time participant have, and who might your chosen channel miss? The idea behind this
Communication strategy
How will a reader check the information without relying only on a screenshot? The idea behind this
Law and legal concepts
Which election office governs the place and election being discussed? The idea behind this
Policy and policy studies
If the proposed fix is clearer information, which participation barriers does that address and which remain? The idea behind this
Education and learning
What assumption about a deadline or eligibility rule would you check before passing it on? The idea behind this
Journalism and reporting
Record the official source, place, election and check date. Separate facts from commentary. The idea behind this
Creativity
Try a source checklist and a plain-language audio guide. Test whether both lead to the same official information. The idea behind this
The research behind this case

These are our teaching applications of the ideas below. For the rule or factual claim itself, use this case’s source file.

Authority and jurisdiction

Cornell Legal Information Institute. Legal reference.

Whether legal authority binds a decision-maker depends on the relevant jurisdiction and legal system.

Keep in mind: This reference introduces a concept. The actual rule, jurisdiction, facts and current primary sources must be checked in each case.

Read the original source

Situational theory of problem solving

Jeong-Nam Kim and James E. Grunig, 2011. Research article.

How people recognize a problem, connect it to their lives and perceive barriers helps explain their communication about it.

Keep in mind: A prompt for asking about people’s circumstances, not a way to infer someone’s beliefs from their identity.

Read the original source
Take this assignment to the making studio

Put your reasoning into words.

You can have a view and still have questions. Build a short take you can explain.

This stays in your browser and is not saved or submitted. Keep personal information out.

Voz asks what comes next

Make it specific.

At Vote.gov, choose your state or territory. Check your registration information and follow the official route to your election office. Find your sample ballot and any rules that apply to you.

Check the sources

Build your own official-information checklist.

  1. Find your election office through Vote.gov or USAGov.
  2. Check eligibility, registration details, deadlines and the sample ballot that applies to you.
  3. Write down one question for the election office and one factual claim to research about a contest.

How you might tell a friend

First I’m checking which ballot and deadlines apply to me. Then I can research the choices.
Una forma de decirlo en español

Primero voy a comprobar qué papeleta y fechas me corresponden. Después puedo investigar las opciones.

Use your own voice. Keep the meaning, the evidence and the limits.

Where this example applies

United States. No candidate, party or ballot-measure endorsement. Rules vary by jurisdiction.

Lupa keeps the sources close

The cultural reference starts a question. The other sources support the explanation.

Open the source file.

1

Your state or territory’s voting information

The official registration gateway and routes for checking or updating registration.

2

Preparing to vote at 18 and under

Preregistration and voting-age exceptions depend on location.

3

Sample ballots and voter guides

What each contains and where to find the ballot that applies to you.

Sources checked September 23, 2026. General education; no independent expert review is claimed. Source standards

Another angle?

Find another case
Bring this case to your course

English language arts and writing are the main fit. Civics, journalism, communications and sociology courses can add their disciplinary sources. These are selected practice targets; your submitted work shows what you can do.

Common Core targets and evidence

Grade 6

a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check; a revised written product; and a teacher observation or transcript of collaborative discussion.

  • RI.6.1 Cite a relevant source passage and distinguish what it states from an inference. Apply this to official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • W.6.2 Explain the distinctions among official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification in a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check.
  • W.6.5 Submit a first draft and revision; identify a factual, reasoning or audience change prompted by feedback.
  • SL.6.1.c Ask a specific question, respond with detail and paraphrase another perspective.
  • SL.6.1.d Ask a specific question, respond with detail and paraphrase another perspective.
Grade 7

a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check; a revised written product; and a teacher observation or transcript of collaborative discussion.

  • RI.7.1 Cite several relevant source details and explain how they support the distinction. Apply this to official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • W.7.2 Explain the distinctions among official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification in a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check.
  • W.7.5 Submit a first draft and revision; identify a factual, reasoning or audience change prompted by feedback.
  • SL.7.1.c Ask for elaboration and record whether new information changes your view.
  • SL.7.1.d Ask for elaboration and record whether new information changes your view.
Grade 8

a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check; a revised written product; and a teacher observation or transcript of collaborative discussion.

  • RI.8.1 Select the strongest evidence and explain why it is stronger than an alternative detail. Apply this to official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • W.8.2 Explain the distinctions among official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification in a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check.
  • W.8.5 Submit a first draft and revision; identify a factual, reasoning or audience change prompted by feedback.
  • SL.8.1.c Connect ideas from several speakers and qualify or justify your view with evidence.
  • SL.8.1.d Connect ideas from several speakers and qualify or justify your view with evidence.
Grade 9–10

a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check; a revised written product; and a teacher observation or transcript of collaborative discussion.

  • RI.9-10.1 Use strong, thorough evidence and distinguish direct source support from a disputed inference. Apply this to official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • W.9-10.2 Explain the distinctions among official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification in a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check.
  • W.9-10.5 Submit a first draft and revision; identify a factual, reasoning or audience change prompted by feedback.
  • SL.9-10.1.c Invite a peer, verify or challenge a conclusion, and summarize agreement and disagreement.
  • SL.9-10.1.d Invite a peer, verify or challenge a conclusion, and summarize agreement and disagreement.
Grade 11–12

a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check; a revised written product; and a teacher observation or transcript of collaborative discussion.

  • RI.11-12.1 Use strong, thorough evidence and explicitly identify an uncertainty that the source leaves unresolved. Apply this to official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • W.11-12.2 Explain the distinctions among official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification in a dated source guide recording jurisdiction, office, official URL and facts still needing a check.
  • W.11-12.5 Submit a first draft and revision; identify a factual, reasoning or audience change prompted by feedback.
  • SL.11-12.1.c Synthesize positions, resolve a contradiction where possible and name additional information needed.
  • SL.11-12.1.d Synthesize positions, resolve a contradiction where possible and name additional information needed.

Course variations

Pre-AP English 1 and English 2 practice

English 1: Closely annotate two pivotal wording or design choices in the case records about official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification; write one analytical paragraph explaining how those choices affect meaning, then revise the case product. English 2: Compare three relevant records, develop a cohesive multi-paragraph analysis or supported recommendation, address a competing interpretation and explain one revision.

Turn in: English 1: annotated excerpt + analytical paragraph + revised product. English 2: source comparison + sustained analysis/argument + revision memo.

  • Specific details support the explanation of official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • Commentary connects wording or design to meaning, rather than only naming features.
  • The argument/analysis has a precise focus and relevant evidence.
  • English 2 integrates sources and addresses a plausible competing view.
Official course framework
AP English Language practice

Argue which information and source-checking steps a first-time local voter guide should prioritize without endorsing a candidate. Build a defensible thesis from the case records and appropriate primary-source material; explain how each source supports the reasoning, qualify a claim and revise the argument for the case’s named audience.

Turn in: Source-supported argument + fair counterclaim + audience-specific revision and commentary

  • A defensible thesis takes a clear, qualified position.
  • Evidence and commentary accurately handle official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • The strongest plausible counterclaim receives fair treatment.
  • Organization and language suit the intended reader; qualification reflects an actual evidentiary limit.

Selected course-skill practice; not an official AP task, exam simulation or score prediction.

Official course framework
IB MYP Language and Literature practice

Compare two case texts about official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification, supporting an interpretation of a creator’s choices. Organize the findings with references, create the case’s reader-facing product, then explain how a draft changed for its audience.

Turn in: Supported text comparison + referenced plan + original revised product + audience reflection

  • A: A supported comparison explains a textual choice connected to official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • B: Ideas and references are organized so the reader can follow the reasoning.
  • C: The original product makes intentional choices for a specified audience and shows development from draft to revision.
  • D: Vocabulary, register and expression communicate accurately in the chosen context.

Teacher selects the actual MYP year descriptors. These local indicators do not assign official achievement levels.

Official course framework
IB DP Language A: Language and Literature practice

How do a local election information page’s hierarchy, instructions and labels position the first-time reader? Choose a substantive nonliterary case text and write a guided textual analysis: develop an interpretation, analyze specific authorial choices and evaluate how they shape meaning. Keep a public-policy recommendation separate from the textual analysis.

Turn in: Focused guided textual analysis of one substantial nonliterary text, with precise textual/visual references

  • A: A reasoned interpretation is grounded in relevant references.
  • B: Analysis evaluates how particular language, structure or visual choices shape meaning.
  • C: A focused line of argument connects paragraphs.
  • D: Clear, precise analytical language suits the task.

Paper 1 skill practice only. Not an assessed individual oral, HL essay or Paper 2; those have additional work/body-of-work requirements.

Official course framework
Honors extension — locally defined

Compare two official election information pages for the same jurisdiction/date, reconcile differences and document unresolved questions. Independently locate an appropriate corroborating source, document its limits and defend which new evidence would change your conclusion.

Turn in: Independent inquiry/decision memo + rival explanation or option + limitations/revision-trigger note

  • Independent evidence is traceable and relevant.
  • The analysis accurately handles official jurisdiction-specific election information and details requiring current verification.
  • A serious competing interpretation or option is tested fairly.
  • The conclusion names a material limit and a concrete condition for revision.

No national Honors code or certification is asserted. Add the school’s actual course expectations.

Set the criteria with your local course teacher.

Keep the first draft, source notes, a discussion record and your revision. A solo response does not demonstrate a collaborative discussion standard. AP, Pre-AP and IB routes are independently designed practice, not official program assessments. Honors expectations are set locally.

See the complete curriculum crosswalk