The redraft circle
One person writes the first response. Everyone helps make the second one more useful.
Pick roles
Writer: draft a supported explanation.
Reader: explain what you understood without being coached.
Evidence partner: check the main claim against a source.
Work through it
The writer listens first, then revises. The reader explains the new version. Rotate roles on a second prompt.
Make this together
Two versions with a short note on what changed and why.
Check the result
Can you trace each meaningful revision to feedback or evidence?
