Lesson 19: What should Gia say in her two-minute comment? Educator guide
Gia has two minutes to speak to the parks committee about the court lights, but her draft is three pages long.
- Grades 6–12 and college
- 45-minute lesson
- 4 evidence documents
- Lesson 19 of 20

Overview
Students read a short story in which Gia wants to speak against a proposal to close the park’s lighted courts at 8 p.m. They read the parks committee agenda, the comment instructions and a nearby resident’s comment. They find the item, the deciding body, the deadline and the time limit. They then cut Gia’s three-page draft into a timed comment that makes one specific request.
Key terms
- Agenda item
An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business. En español: punto del orden del día
In this case: Item 4, “Evening court hours,” proposes turning off the court lights at 8:00 p.m. Its action is a committee recommendation to the full council.
- Remit
A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on. En español: competencia
In this case: The parks committee can recommend court hours. It cannot change bus routes, so page two of Gia’s draft belongs with a different body.
- Public record
A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments. En español: registro público
In this case: Comments and speakers’ names become part of the public record. That is why Gia leaves her friend’s private situation out of her comment.
Where this example applies
Seattle is a specific real-world process example, not a rule for every city. Comment deadlines, time limits, registration, and procedures vary; check the current local meeting instructions.
Grade levels, subjects and time
- Grade levels
- 6–12, plus college and community groups.
- Subjects
- English language arts; also civics and communications.
- Time
- 45 minutes for the lesson steps on this page. The student page takes 20 to 30 minutes.
Learning objectives
Students will be able to:
- find the agenda item, the deciding body, the deadline and the time limit for a public comment;
- cut a long draft to a time limit while keeping the item, one observation and one request;
- leave private details out of a comment that becomes part of the public record.
What students should already be able to do
The student edition for each grade band assumes students can already:
- Grades 6–8
- find a number and a time in a short document; tell something they saw from something they feel; read a short text aloud to a partner.
- Grades 9–10
- summarize a short document accurately; tell a fact from a feeling in a draft; revise a paragraph for a named audience.
- Grades 11–12
- read a formal document for its action and its rules; explain which body has the power to decide a question; write for a public audience with a clear request.
- College and community
- read an agenda for its item, action and deciding body; write for two different audiences; rehearse a timed spoken text.
Skills, terms and roles
New skill
Fit a request to the body’s remit and time limit
Cut a comment to one request the committee has the power to act on, in the time allowed.
Key terms
- New in this case
- Agenda item, Remit, Public record
Character spotlight
Gia leads. Gia grew up in Fort Greene and is speaking at a public meeting for the first time. She knows what she wants to say, but it takes her three pages.
- Mateo: He times her from a bench and listens the way a committee member might, waiting for one request he could repeat back.
The student’s role
You’re the one holding the timer and listening for the request.
Materials
- The student page for Lesson 19: What should Gia say in her two-minute comment?. Students read the case, look at the evidence and write their response there.
- The evidence handout below: 4 documents, one copy per pair.
- The student edition for your grade band, printed or on screen. See printable pages by grade band.
Evidence handout
Evidence A Meeting agenda
Item 4 on the parks committee agenda
Item 4. Evening court hours. Proposal to turn off the court lights and close the lighted courts at 8:00 p.m. Background: complaints about evening noise from nearby residents. Action: committee recommendation to the full council.
What it shows: Item 4 is only about the court lights and the courts’ closing time. The committee recommends, and the full council decides.
What it leaves out: How many residents complained, and whether the committee looked at other closing times.
Ask: Circle the item number, the proposed time and the action.
Evidence B Comment rules
How to comment at the meeting
Sign up to speak by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Each speaker has 2 minutes. Written comments may be submitted before the meeting. Comments and speakers’ names become part of the public record.
What it shows: Gia has two minutes to speak. She could also send a written comment. Her name and words will be public.
What it leaves out: How the full council usually treats the committee’s recommendation.
Ask: Underline the deadline, the time limit and what becomes public.
Evidence C Draft
Gia’s three-page draft (excerpt)
“The park is really important to everyone and closing it is a terrible idea. I go there all the time with my friends… You guys never listen to young people. Please don’t close the park.”
What it shows: Gia cares about the park and uses it often. The request in this excerpt is “Please don’t close the park.”
What it leaves out: The item number, the court lights and the 8 p.m. time. Item 4 does not propose closing the park.
Ask: Find the request. Does it match what item 4 proposes?
Evidence D Written comment
A comment from a nearby resident
“The courts are good for the neighborhood, but the noise late in the evening carries into our apartment. We have kids with school in the morning.”
What it shows: This resident likes the courts but hears the noise at home. Their kids have school in the morning.
What it leaves out: What time the noise becomes a problem for this family.
Ask: What does this resident like, and what is the problem?
Printable pages by grade band
Each grade band has its own student pages and educator pages for this case. The educator pages show every student page with sample answers. See every printable page for this case, including the course editions.
| Grade band | Educator pages | Student pages |
|---|---|---|
| Grades 6–8 | Open on screen Print this case Download PDF, 476 KB | Open on screen Print this case Download fillable PDF, 348 KB |
| Grades 9–10 | Open on screen Print this case Download PDF, 489 KB | Open on screen Print this case Download fillable PDF, 356 KB |
| Grades 11–12 | Open on screen Print this case Download PDF, 439 KB | Open on screen Print this case Download fillable PDF, 498 KB |
| College and community | Open on screen Print this case Download PDF, 639 KB | Open on screen Print this case Download fillable PDF, 497 KB |
Real news and research for this case
These news stories and studies are real. Each link opens the original in a new tab.
Real source News Chalkbeat Philadelphia April 3, 2026
‘Not what democracy is all about’: Philly students slam school leaders’ approach to school closures
Students testified at board meetings and used district data, real public comment with a clear destination.
Read on chalkbeat.org (opens in a new tab)Real source News Chalkbeat Newark November 26, 2025
How a Newark student coalition is using its own research to press for change in schools
Teens brought evidence and specific requests to their school board, the formula this case teaches.
Read on chalkbeat.org (opens in a new tab)More news and research (4)
Real source News The Philadelphia Citizen March 10, 2025
How to Speak at Philadelphia City Council, School Board Meetings
A step-by-step guide to signing up, finding the agenda item and fitting your point into the time limit.
Read on thephiladelphiacitizen.org (opens in a new tab)Real source Government source U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division No date listed
How to Comment on a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
A federal agency explains that comments become public record and work best with specific experience and data.
Read on dol.gov (opens in a new tab)Real source Research Perspectives on Politics (Einstein, Palmer & Glick) October 14, 2018
Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes
Study of meeting records showing commenters often don’t reflect the whole community, which is why new voices matter.
Read on doi.org (opens in a new tab)Real source Research American Journal of Political Science (Sahn) August 31, 2024
Public comment and public policy
Peer-reviewed research on whether and how public comment at local meetings connects to policy outcomes.
Read on doi.org (opens in a new tab)Links checked September 24, 2026.
Professional standards
Many professions publish a code of ethics. These parts of real codes apply to this case.
Real source American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) 2013
ASPA Code of Ethics: 3. Promote democratic participation.
Inform the public and encourage active engagement in governance. Be open, transparent and responsive, and respect and assist all persons in their dealings with public organizations.
In plain words: ASPA's code asks people in public service to make it easy for every affected person to take part in decisions.
Ask: The instructions allow written comments in advance. How does that help court users who cannot come at 6 p.m.?
Sample answers
- Grades 6–8
- Written comments help because people who work late can still send their ideas before the meeting.
- Grades 9–10
- A written comment lets court users who work during the 6 p.m. meeting reach the committee before it makes its recommendation.
- Grades 11–12
- Written comments open the process to people who work at 6 p.m., but they only help people who know about item 4 before the meeting.
Real source National Communication Association (NCA) 2024
Credo for Ethical Communication: “We endorse freedom of expression, diversity of perspective, and acknowledgement of dissent…” (one of nine unnumbered principles)
We endorse freedom of expression, diversity of perspective, and acknowledgement of dissent to achieve the informed and responsible decision-making fundamental to civil society.
In plain words: NCA members support free speech and agree to acknowledge people who disagree with them.
Ask: A neighbor wrote that late noise reaches an apartment with kids who have school. How could Gia's comment acknowledge that?
Sample answers
- Grades 6–8
- Gia could say she understands the noise problem and ask for lights until 9, not later.
- Grades 9–10
- Gia could acknowledge the concern by naming it in one sentence, then asking for lights until 9 on weekdays.
- Grades 11–12
- Gia could acknowledge the concern by saying she understands it, then asking for 9 p.m. on weekdays and a review of the noise complaints.
Real source Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) 2014
SPJ Code of Ethics: Minimize Harm
Realize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures and others who seek power, influence or attention.
In plain words: Journalists who follow the SPJ code take extra care before they publish private details about ordinary people.
Ask: Comments become public record. Should Gia's comment keep the detail that her friend “is going through a lot at home”?
Sample answers
- Grades 6–8
- The detail should come out because it is the friend’s private story, and the comment will be public.
- Grades 9–10
- The detail should come out because the friend did not choose to share it, and comments stay on the public record.
- Grades 11–12
- The detail should come out because a private person controls her own story. Gia can keep the public point: many court users work late.
Share, schedule or open in your apps
Reading passage by grade band
Each grade band has its own longer reading passage built from this case’s story and its real sources. Real news, laws and research are cited in the text with their dates. Three “Stop and think” questions sit inside each passage. Open a band to read it, or print that band on its own.
Grades 6–8: Two minutes at the microphone
458 words
Two minutes at the microphone
The story: Three pages, two minutes
It is Tuesday at 5:40 p.m. The parks committee meets at 6. Item 4 on its agenda is a proposal to turn off the park’s court lights at 8 p.m. The reason given is complaints about evening noise from nearby residents.
Gia, 21, wants to speak against item 4. It is her first time speaking at a public meeting. Each speaker gets two minutes. On Monday night, she wrote a three-page draft. When she reads page one out loud, it takes two minutes and forty seconds.
Mateo is timing Gia from a bench. He follows every word, but he cannot tell what she wants the committee to do. So he asks her one question: “If they only remember one sentence, what is it?”
Your role is to hold the timer and listen for the request.
What the committee can do
An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business. Item 4 is only about the court lights and closing time. Gia’s draft says, “Please don’t close the park.” But nobody is closing the park. It is the lights at 8 p.m.
A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on. Page two of Gia’s draft is all about the bus. The bus is a real problem, but the parks committee cannot change bus routes. In Lesson 10, you learned to take a problem to the office responsible. The bus question belongs somewhere else.
In Lesson 4, you learned that a proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet. Item 4 is a proposal. You also learned that a decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice. The agenda says the committee makes a recommendation, and the full council decides.
A short comment can do four jobs. It names the agenda item, shares something the speaker saw, says why it matters and ends with a clear request. Gia’s version is short. Item 4. What she counted: twenty or thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of them work late. Her request: keep the lights on until 9 on weekdays this summer.
One more thing comes out. The draft mentions a friend’s private situation. A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments. Gia’s words and her name will be public. Her friend’s story is her friend’s to share.
Real students at real meetings
In Philadelphia, students testified at school board meetings about school closures, using the district’s own data (Chalkbeat Philadelphia, April 3, 2026). In Newark, a student coalition brought its own research and specific requests to the school board (Chalkbeat Newark, November 26, 2025).
Key terms in this passage
- Agenda item
- An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business.
- Remit
- A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on.
- Public record
- A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments.
- Proposal
- A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
- Decision-maker
- A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.
Real sources cited
- Chalkbeat Philadelphia, “‘Not what democracy is all about’: Philly students slam school leaders’ approach to school closures,” April 3, 2026. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Chalkbeat Newark, “How a Newark student coalition is using its own research to press for change in schools,” November 26, 2025. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
Grades 9–10: One request the committee can answer
618 words
One request the committee can answer
The story: A practice run on a bench
At 5:40 p.m. on a Tuesday, twenty minutes before the parks committee meets, Gia is reading her public comment out loud to Mateo. Item 4 on the agenda proposes turning off the park’s court lights and closing the lighted courts at 8 p.m., because nearby residents have complained about evening noise. Gia, who grew up in Fort Greene, wants to speak against it. It is her first time at a public meeting.
The rules are simple. Sign up by 5 p.m., speak for two minutes, and know that comments and speakers’ names become part of the public record. Written comments may be sent in before the meeting too. Gia’s problem is length. On Monday night, she wrote three pages. Page one alone takes two minutes and forty seconds.
Mateo is timing Gia from a bench, and he listens the way a committee member might. He follows all of it. He still could not tell anyone what she wants the committee to do. Instead of rewriting her draft, he asks one question. If they only remember one sentence, what is it? Whatever she answers, he says, that sentence goes first.
Your role is to hold the timer and listen for the request.
Cutting to the remit
An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business. Item 4 is narrow: court lights and a closing time. Gia’s draft asks the committee not to close the park, which nobody has proposed. A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on. Page two, about the bus, is a real problem outside the parks committee’s remit. Lesson 10 taught you to send a problem to the office responsible, so the bus goes to a different office on a different day.
The new skill is fitting a request to the body’s remit and time limit. It builds on Lesson 4. There, the crew prepared a comment for a nonprofit board, and you learned that a proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet. You also learned that a decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice. The agenda shows the chain. The committee makes a recommendation, and the full council decides.
Gia’s answer to Mateo’s question becomes the spine of the comment. Name item 4. Share what she counted: twenty or thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Explain why it matters: a lot of them work late. End with one request the committee can act on: keep the lights on until 9 on weekdays this summer.
The comment should also acknowledge the other side. A nearby resident wrote that the courts are good for the neighborhood but that late noise carries into their apartment, and they have kids with school in the morning. A request for 9 p.m. instead of 8 p.m. gives the committee a middle option.
Finally, Gia cuts her friend’s private situation. A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments. The story is her friend’s, not hers.
How public comment works in real places
Every body sets its own rules. Seattle City Council, for example, takes spoken comments in person or by phone and written comments by email, and each speaker gets up to two minutes (Seattle City Council, no date listed). A Philadelphia guide walks residents through signing up, finding the agenda item and fitting a point into the time limit (The Philadelphia Citizen, March 10, 2025). Students have used this process too. In Newark, a student coalition brought its own research and specific requests to the school board (Chalkbeat Newark, November 26, 2025).
Key terms in this passage
- Agenda item
- An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business.
- Remit
- A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on.
- Public record
- A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments.
- Proposal
- A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
- Decision-maker
- A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.
Real sources cited
- Seattle City Council, “Public Comment,” No date listed. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- The Philadelphia Citizen, “How to Speak at Philadelphia City Council, School Board Meetings,” March 10, 2025. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Chalkbeat Newark, “How a Newark student coalition is using its own research to press for change in schools,” November 26, 2025. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
Grades 11–12: Two minutes, one ask
710 words
Two minutes, one ask
The story: The first time at the microphone
Gia, 21, has spent her life in Fort Greene, and the park is part of her week. On Tuesday, the parks committee meets at 6 p.m. Item 4 on its agenda proposes turning off the court lights and closing the lighted courts at 8 p.m., citing complaints about evening noise from nearby residents. The agenda lists the action as a committee recommendation to the full council. Gia wants to speak against it. She has never spoken at a public meeting before.
The rules give her two minutes. Speakers sign up by 5 p.m., written comments may be submitted in advance and comments and names become part of the public record. At 5:40, Gia reads her draft aloud on a bench while Mateo, 22, times her. The draft runs three pages, and page one alone takes two minutes and forty seconds. It also contains a friend’s private situation and a page about the bus.
Mateo’s feedback is precise without being a rewrite. He followed every word and still cannot say what she wants the committee to do. His question is the most useful editing tool in the case. If the committee remembers one sentence, what is it? That sentence goes first.
Your role is to hold the timer and listen for the request.
Matching a request to a body
An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business. A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on. The two concepts define what Gia can usefully ask. Item 4 concerns lighting and closing time. The committee’s remit includes recommending court hours. It does not include buses. Her draft’s central plea, “Please don’t close the park,” misstates the item, since no one has proposed closing the park.
The new skill is fitting a request to the body’s remit and time limit, and it assembles earlier skills. Lesson 4 introduced the proposal, a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet, and the decision-maker, the person or group with the power to make a particular choice. Here the chain has two links. The committee recommends, and the full council decides. Lesson 10 taught you to route a problem to the office responsible, which is why the bus page belongs with a transit office rather than this committee.
A strong two-minute comment does four jobs. It names the agenda item, reports an observation, explains why it matters and makes one request. Gia’s revised comment does exactly that. It names item 4. It reports that she counted twenty or thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. It notes that many of them work late. And it asks for lights until 9 on weekdays this summer. The request also engages the resident who wrote that late noise carries into their apartment and that their kids have school in the morning. Asking for 9 rather than no change gives the committee a middle path that answers both concerns in part.
The final cut is ethical. A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments. Everything Gia says will be attached to her name and kept. Her friend’s situation belongs to her friend, so it comes out.
Research and real practice
Rules differ by body. Seattle City Council accepts spoken comment in person or by phone and written comment by email, with up to two minutes per speaker (Seattle City Council, no date listed). That is one city’s process, not a rule for every council. Research raises a harder question about who shows up. A study of meeting minutes found that local commenters often do not reflect the whole community (Einstein, Palmer and Glick, Perspectives on Politics, October 14, 2018). Other peer-reviewed work examines whether and how public comment connects to policy outcomes (Sahn, American Journal of Political Science, August 31, 2024).
Young people are using the process well. Philadelphia students testified at board meetings about school closures, drawing on district data (Chalkbeat Philadelphia, April 3, 2026). Journalists hold a related privacy standard. The SPJ code says “private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures” (SPJ Code of Ethics, September 6, 2014). Gia applies that principle to her friend.
Key terms in this passage
- Agenda item
- An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business.
- Remit
- A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on.
- Public record
- A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments.
- Proposal
- A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
- Decision-maker
- A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.
Real sources cited
- Seattle City Council, “Public Comment,” No date listed. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Perspectives on Politics (Einstein, Palmer & Glick), “Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes,” October 14, 2018. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- American Journal of Political Science (Sahn), “Public comment and public policy,” August 31, 2024. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Chalkbeat Philadelphia, “‘Not what democracy is all about’: Philly students slam school leaders’ approach to school closures,” April 3, 2026. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), “SPJ Code of Ethics,” 2014. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
College and community: Public comment as civic craft
775 words
Public comment as civic craft
The story: A comment built for its audience
Gia, 21, plans to speak against a parks committee proposal. Item 4 would turn off the park’s court lights and close the lighted courts at 8 p.m., citing residents’ complaints about evening noise. The agenda frames the action as a committee recommendation to the full council. Speakers sign up by 5 p.m., get two minutes each and become part of the public record by name. Written comments are accepted in advance.
Gia’s draft reflects a common first-time pattern. It is three pages long, with page one alone at two minutes and forty seconds. It centers on a request no one can grant, “Please don’t close the park,” when the item concerns lights and hours. It spends a page on the bus, a real issue outside the committee’s authority. It includes a friend’s private circumstances. It also addresses the committee as “you guys” who “never listen to young people.”
Mateo, 22, times a practice run from a bench and listens as a committee member would. His diagnosis is that the comment contains no request he could repeat back. His intervention is a question rather than an edit: if the committee remembers one sentence, what is it? The answer becomes the opening line.
Your role is to hold the timer and listen for the request.
Remit, sequence and the public record
An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business. A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on. Effective participation depends on matching the request to both. Item 4 is about lighting and hours, and the committee’s remit extends to recommending court hours. The bus is out of scope, so under Lesson 10’s principle of routing problems to the responsible office, it goes elsewhere.
The case assembles earlier skills into a single practical sequence. Lesson 4 introduced the proposal, a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet, and the decision-maker, the person or group with the power to make a particular choice. The agenda reveals a two-step structure. The committee recommends, and the council decides. That tells Gia both what to ask for and that later chances to speak may exist.
Her revised comment follows a four-part structure that works in many settings. It identifies the item, reports an observation, explains its significance and makes a single actionable request. She counted twenty or thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9, many of whom work late, and she asks for lights until 9 on weekdays this summer. The request also engages the opposing written comment, from a resident who likes the courts but hears late noise at home and has children with school in the morning. A 9 p.m. compromise gives the committee a way to act on both concerns.
The last revision concerns privacy. A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments. Speaking publicly means accepting that one’s own words become part of that record. It does not license publishing someone else’s private situation.
Participation, representation and professional ethics
Public comment procedures are local. Seattle City Council, for example, accepts spoken comment in person or by phone and written comment by email, with up to two minutes per speaker (Seattle City Council, no date listed). The U.S. Department of Labor advises federal rulemaking commenters that comments become public and work best with specific experience and data (U.S. Department of Labor, no date listed).
Political scientists have studied who participates. Einstein, Palmer and Glick found from meeting minutes that local commenters are often unrepresentative of the broader community (Perspectives on Politics, October 14, 2018). Sahn examined whether and how public comment connects to policy outcomes (American Journal of Political Science, August 31, 2024). Together, these studies suggest both the limits of comment and the value of new voices. Student groups in Newark and Philadelphia have brought their own research and district data to school boards (Chalkbeat Newark, November 26, 2025; Chalkbeat Philadelphia, April 3, 2026).
The pop-culture version is instructive by contrast. In the first episode of Parks and Recreation (NBC, April 9, 2009), Ann Perkins complains at a public forum about a construction pit, and Leslie Knope promises on the spot to build a park. In our reading, real meetings run on agendas, time limits and bodies that can decide only some things.
Professional codes describe both sides of the exchange. ASPA asks public servants to “inform the public and encourage active engagement in governance” (ASPA Code of Ethics, 2013). The NCA credo endorses “freedom of expression, diversity of perspective, and acknowledgement of dissent” (NCA Credo for Ethical Communication, 2024).
Key terms in this passage
- Agenda item
- An agenda item is one topic listed on a meeting’s official schedule of business.
- Remit
- A remit is the set of matters that a committee or other body is responsible for and can act on.
- Public record
- A public record is information a government keeps that anyone can ask to see, such as meeting comments.
- Proposal
- A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
- Decision-maker
- A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.
Real sources cited
- Seattle City Council, “Public Comment,” No date listed. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, “How to Comment on a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM),” No date listed. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Perspectives on Politics (Einstein, Palmer & Glick), “Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes,” October 14, 2018. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- American Journal of Political Science (Sahn), “Public comment and public policy,” August 31, 2024. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Chalkbeat Newark, “How a Newark student coalition is using its own research to press for change in schools,” November 26, 2025. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Chalkbeat Philadelphia, “‘Not what democracy is all about’: Philly students slam school leaders’ approach to school closures,” April 3, 2026. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- Peacock, “Parks and Recreation,” 2009. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), “ASPA Code of Ethics,” 2013. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
- National Communication Association (NCA), “Credo for Ethical Communication,” 2024. Open the source (opens in a new tab)
Pacing options
10-minute bellringer
10 minutes
One piece of evidence and one question. Use it to open the case or to review it the next day.
One class period
45 minutes
Teach the lesson steps on this page in four parts.
The student edition also has a one-period plan for each grade band:
- Grades 6–8: 45 minutes
- Grades 9–10: 50 minutes
- Grades 11–12: 60 minutes
- College and community: 75 minutes
Full chapter
72 to 97 minutes
Teach every page of the student edition chapter. The educator edition has notes and sample answers beside each page.
- Grades 6–8: 72 minutes
- Grades 9–10: 80 minutes
- Grades 11–12: 87 minutes
- College and community: 97 minutes
Minutes for each page
How long each student edition page takes, and what to cut when you have one class period.
Open your grade band.
Grades 6–8: full chapter 72 minutes, one period 45 minutes
| Page | Full chapter | One period | How to cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opener | 5 min | 4 min | Read What happened aloud and go straight to the key terms. |
| Key terms | 6 min | 3 min | Read the key terms aloud. Skip Who is involved. |
| Look at the evidence | 10 min | 8 min | Read Evidence A and B aloud. Students fill in only the What it shows boxes. |
| Key idea | 6 min | 2 min | Read the first paragraph of the key idea aloud. Skip the code of ethics. |
| Sort the evidence | 6 min | Skip | Skip this page. |
| Practice | 6 min | 4 min | Vote on the three openings and skip the marked draft. |
| Your task | 8 min | 8 min | |
| Your draft | 12 min | 12 min | |
| Check your work | 5 min | Skip | Skip this page. Check each comment against the four success points yourself. |
| Questions to discuss | 8 min | 4 min | Use question 4 as an exit ticket. |
| Talk about this case at home | At home | At home |
Grades 9–10: full chapter 80 minutes, one period 50 minutes
| Page | Full chapter | One period | How to cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opener | 4 min | 3 min | Read the summary line and the first paragraph aloud. |
| Key terms | 5 min | Skip | Skip this page. Define remit and public record aloud in one minute. |
| Look at the evidence | 6 min | 5 min | Students fill in only the What it shows boxes for Evidence A and B. |
| Look at the evidence, continued | 6 min | 5 min | Read Evidence C and D aloud. Students fill in only the What it leaves out boxes. |
| Key idea | 7 min | Skip | Assign the key idea as reading for the next class. |
| Sort the evidence | 6 min | Skip | Skip this page. |
| Practice | 6 min | 5 min | Vote on the three openings. Skip the marked draft, because the task covers it. |
| Your task | 8 min | 8 min | |
| Your draft | 18 min | 16 min | Students write the comment in class and finish the cutting note at home. |
| Check your work | 6 min | 4 min | Students answer the Check your work questions only. |
| Questions to discuss | 8 min | 4 min | Use question 4 as an exit ticket. |
| Talk about this case at home | At home | At home |
Grades 11–12: full chapter 87 minutes, one period 60 minutes
| Page | Full chapter | One period | How to cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opener | 4 min | 3 min | Read the summary line aloud and go straight to the evidence. |
| Key terms | 4 min | Skip | Skip this page. |
| Look at the evidence | 6 min | 5 min | Students fill in only the What it leaves out boxes. |
| Look at the evidence, continued | 5 min | 3 min | Read Evidence C and D aloud; skip their boxes. |
| Key idea | 8 min | 5 min | Read the remit paragraph only. Skip In the news. |
| Sort the evidence | 6 min | Skip | Skip this page. |
| Practice | 5 min | Skip | Skip this page. |
| Your task | 15 min | 15 min | |
| Your draft | 20 min | 20 min | |
| Check your work | 6 min | 5 min | Students answer the Check your work questions only. |
| Questions to discuss | 8 min | 4 min | Use question 1 as an exit ticket. |
| Talk about this case at home | At home | At home |
College and community: full chapter 97 minutes, one period 75 minutes
| Page | Full chapter | One period | How to cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opener | 4 min | 3 min | Read What happened aloud and go straight to the key terms. |
| Key terms | 4 min | 2 min | Read the key terms aloud. Skip Who is involved. |
| Look at the evidence | 7 min | 6 min | Participants fill in only the What it shows boxes. |
| Look at the evidence, continued | 6 min | 5 min | Participants fill in only the What it leaves out boxes. |
| Key idea | 10 min | 6 min | Skip In the news. |
| Sort the evidence | 6 min | Skip | Skip this page. |
| Practice | 5 min | 4 min | Vote on the three openings and skip the marked draft. |
| Your task | 12 min | 12 min | |
| Your draft | 25 min | 25 min | |
| Check your work | 8 min | 5 min | Participants answer the Check your work questions only. |
| Questions to discuss | 10 min | 7 min | Use question 3 as a closing question. |
| Talk about this case at home | At home | At home |
Minutes for each page are in the educator edition for each grade band.
10-minute bellringer
- 1 min Project Evidence A as students come in.
- 5 min Students read it on their own. Each student writes a one-sentence answer to the question.
- 4 min Take two or three answers. Then ask the follow-up questions.
Evidence A Meeting agenda
Item 4 on the parks committee agenda
Item 4. Evening court hours. Proposal to turn off the court lights and close the lighted courts at 8:00 p.m. Background: complaints about evening noise from nearby residents. Action: committee recommendation to the full council.
Question What does the proposal in item 4 change?
Follow-up questions
- Does this committee make the final decision?
- Who might want to speak about this item?
Listen for: Students say that the committee makes a recommendation and the full council decides.
This is the same bellringer as on the bellringers page, which has one for every case.
Lesson steps
This plan takes 45 minutes in four parts. Each step says what you do, what students do and how to check.
Warm-up 5 minutes
1 Pawnee vs. real 5 min
- You
- Contrast a Parks and Recreation meeting clip description with a real agenda page.
- Students
- Note three differences.
- Check
- Students notice time limits, agenda items and sign-up rules.
Read and discuss 18 minutes
2 Find the destination 8 min
- You
- Show the committee agenda and comment instructions.
- Students
- Identify the item, the body, the deadline and the time limit.
- Check
- Students find item 4, the parks committee and a 2-minute limit.
3 Cut the draft 10 min
- You
- Show Gia’s three-page draft summary.
- Students
- Highlight what stays: item, observation, why it matters, request.
- Check
- Kept lines map onto the four parts.
Questions for the people in the case
- Gia: What stays in the two minutes? Check next: Keep the item, one observation, why it matters and one request the committee can act on.
- Gia: What comes out of the draft? Check next: Check your wording against the agenda, and leave out anyone’s private situation.
- Mateo: How do you tell her without rewriting her? Check next: Have a listener repeat the request back in one sentence.
- Mateo: Anything that doesn’t belong in this room? Check next: Match each request to the body that can act on it.
Task 12 minutes
4 Write and time 12 min
- You
- Model a 90-second comment. Hand out timers.
- Students
- Write and time a 90-second comment.
- Check
- Comment fits the time and ends with a specific request.
Wrap-up 10 minutes
5 Listener test 7 min
- You
- Partners play committee members.
- Students
- Repeat the request back in one sentence.
- Check
- Listener can restate the request accurately.
6 Exit 3 min
- You
- Ask: what would you leave out because it may become public?
- Students
- Write one example.
- Check
- Example involves someone else’s private information.
Educator notes by page
These notes follow the pages of the student edition chapter. The educator edition prints the same notes beside each page. Heat check tells you how likely a page is to bring up strong feelings: low, medium or high. Medium and high pages come with a cool-down. Open a page to see what to say, what to watch for and how to support students.
Opener
Heat check: Low
Say this
- “You get two minutes at a public meeting. What would you say first?” Collect two or three answers. Do not correct anyone yet.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students think the park is closing.
- Listen for:
- “They’re shutting down the park.”
- Then:
- Ask what item 4 says exactly. It turns off the court lights at 8 p.m.
Support
- Read What happened aloud while students follow along.
Key terms
Heat check: Low
Say this
- “Which part of item 4 tells you what the committee can do?” Point to the action line: a recommendation to the full council.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students think the committee makes the final decision.
- Listen for:
- “The committee decides tonight.”
- Then:
- Reread the action line. The committee recommends, and the full council decides.
Support
- Pair students who share a language to explain each term with an example from the case.
Look at the evidence
Heat check: Low
Say this
- “Find three facts in the comment rules: the deadline, the time limit and what becomes public.” List them on the board: 5:00 p.m., 2 minutes, comments and names.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students skip the public-record line.
- Listen for:
- “It’s just a meeting, nobody reads that.”
- Then:
- Reread the last sentence of Evidence B. Names and comments stay on the record.
Support
- Give each document on its own half-page with the key line enlarged.
- Read Gia’s draft and the resident’s comment aloud.
Stretch
Ask which document shows who decides and which shows how to speak, and what neither one says about the complaints.
Grades 6–8: notes that replace the ones above
Say this
- “Put your finger on the action line in item 4. Who makes the final decision?” The full council. The committee only recommends.
- “Now find the time limit in the comment rules.” Two minutes. Write it on the board.
Support
- Give Evidence A and B on half-pages with the key lines enlarged.
- Read both documents aloud before students write.
Key idea
Heat check: Low
Say this
- “A remit is what a body can act on. Can the parks committee change bus routes?” No. It can recommend court hours.
- “The ASPA code asks public servants to help people join in. How do written comments help?” Wait for court users who work late.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students treat the ASPA code as a law.
- Listen for:
- “The committee is breaking the law if it ignores her.”
- Then:
- Say: “ASPA’s code is a standard for public servants who belong to ASPA. It is not a law.”
Support
- Read the code aloud. Point out the label: it is a quotation from a real code.
Stretch
Use the NCA row: how could Gia acknowledge the resident’s noise concern in one sentence?
Sort the evidence
Heat check: Medium
Why: The missing-perspective question can turn to students’ own work hours or their neighbors. Cool-down: Keep answers about the court users and residents in the case. No one shares a personal schedule.
Say this
- “Follow Gia’s comment from the meeting to the final decision. Who hears it, and who decides?” Model the first box together: the parks committee.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students leave out the full council.
- Listen for:
- “If the committee says no, it’s over.”
- Then:
- Point to the action line in Evidence A. The full council decides.
Support
- Let students write the name of each body before writing sentences.
Practice
Heat check: Medium
Why: Students may voice frustration about adults ignoring young people. Cool-down: Acknowledge the feeling. Then ask which sentence gives the committee a request.
Say this
- “Gia has two minutes. Which opening gives the committee the most to work with?” Vote before any discussion.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students choose C because it feels honest.
- Listen for:
- “But it’s true, they never listen.”
- Then:
- Ask what the committee could do with that sentence.
Your task and draft
4 grade bands
The task is different in each grade band. Open yours.
Grades 6–8
Your task
Say this
- “Your comment has four boxes: the item, what you saw, why it matters and what you ask.” Draw the four boxes on the board.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- The request is too big or too vague.
- Listen for:
- “Save our park.”
- Then:
- Ask what the committee could recommend. Name the hours and the days.
Support
- Frames: “I’m here about item ___. I noticed ___.”
- Offer a written comment instead of speaking.
Your draft
Say this
- “Read your comment to a partner. Can your partner repeat your request?” Partners play committee members.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Comments run past the time limit.
- Listen for:
- “I’m not done yet.”
- Then:
- Cut any sentence that does not belong in one of the four boxes.
Grades 9–10
Your task
Say this
- “Gia’s draft has good material in it. Which sentence does she most need to keep?” Accept the count of people, then ask for the request.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students cut Gia’s voice along with the extra material.
- Listen for:
- “I made it sound professional.”
- Then:
- Ask which sentence still sounds like Gia. Keep one plain detail, such as her café shifts.
Support
- Cutting checklist: Is it about item 4? Is it Gia’s own story? Does it help the request?
Your draft
Say this
- “Read the comment aloud with a timer. Does it fit in 90 seconds?” Partners time each other and repeat the request back.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- The cutting note explains cuts only by length.
- Listen for:
- “I cut it because it was too long.”
- Then:
- Ask for a second reason: privacy, accuracy or purpose.
Grades 11–12
Your task
Why: Real agendas can include issues that touch students’ own families or neighborhoods. Cool-down: Students may choose any item. No one explains why an item matters to their family.
Say this
- “Before you write, answer three questions: which body, which item, and can it act on your request?” The sample answers use item 4 in Gia’s voice. Students name their own body and item.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students choose an item outside the body’s remit.
- Listen for:
- “I’ll ask the parks committee about the buses.”
- Then:
- Ask what the agenda’s action line says. If the body cannot act, name the body that can.
Support
- Agenda-reading guide: item number, description, action, sign-up deadline, time limit, written option.
Your draft
Say this
- “Read your process note. Could a friend follow it to the next step?” Ask for the name of the next body.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- The comment includes personal details.
- Listen for:
- “I live at …”.
- Then:
- Check the draft against the public-record checklist. Remove addresses and other people’s stories.
College and community
Your task
Say this
- “Your group has two audiences: the committee tonight and the council later. What does each body need?” The committee needs a request it can recommend. The council needs a short record.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Participants write one text for both audiences.
- Listen for:
- “We’ll just send the council our speech.”
- Then:
- Ask what the council needs that the committee already heard.
Your draft
Say this
- “Read the comment aloud with a timer. Where does it pass two minutes?” Partners mark the spot and cut before it.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- The group speaks for people who did not ask it to.
- Listen for:
- “Everyone in the neighborhood wants this.”
- Then:
- Ask who asked the group to speak. Name only the people you know about.
Check your work
Heat check: Low
Say this
- “Mark your level honestly. Then make one change and say why.” Ask for one removed private detail or one sharper request.
Watch for
- Misconception:
- Students only shorten the draft.
- Listen for:
- “I just cut some words.”
- Then:
- Point to the Revision row. Ask why each cut helps the committee or protects someone.
Questions to discuss
Say this
- “Answer with a detail from a document, not a guess about the committee.” Ask for one answer per question.
Stretch
Compare Evidence B with Seattle City Council’s public comment page. Which rules match, and which would you check locally?
Talk about this case at home
Say this
- “Read this page at home with someone you trust.” Nobody needs to share a personal story to complete it.
Sample response
Worked example, grades 9–10
Prompt: Cut Gia’s long draft into a 90-second comment, then write a note explaining what you cut and why.
Student response
Comment: Good evening. I’m Gia, and I live two blocks from the park. 1 I’m here about item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. On weekday evenings 2 I’ve counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. 3 My friend works late and is going through a lot at home, so this is her only time to play. Please keep the lights on until 9 on weekdays this summer. Thank you.
Cutting note: I cut the part about the committee never listening to young people, because 4 it didn’t ask them for anything. I cut the long history of the park so the comment fits in two minutes.
- Audience. A precise destination: the item number and the exact proposal tell the committee what the comment is about.
- Evidence. Strong evidence: a specific, first-hand observation tied to the hours in question.
- Revise. This is someone else’s private story, and it would stay in the public record. Keep the point that people work late without the personal detail.
- Strength. Good reasoning in the note: the cut is justified by purpose, not only by length.
Before: My friend works late and is going through a lot at home, so this is her only time to play.
After: Many of us work until evening, so after 8 is the only time we can play.
Why: The revision keeps the reason that matters to the committee while protecting a friend’s privacy in a permanent record.
Educator commentary: The cut comment has all four parts (item, observation, reason, request) and fits the time, and the cutting note explains choices by purpose. The one miss is keeping a friend’s private situation, which the case flags because comments become public. Fixing it moves the response to Advanced on Audience, and acknowledging the residents’ noise concern would strengthen Reasoning.
Task answers by grade band
What a strong student in each grade band writes in the student edition task.
Open your grade band.
Grades 6–8
Write and practice a 60-second comment for the parks committee about the court hours.
Students make: 60-second comment (about 130 words).
Steps students follow
- Read item 4 in Evidence A. Write the item number and what it proposes.
- Read the comment rules in Evidence B. Write the time limit.
- Write what Gia saw at the courts and why it matters.
- Write one request the parks committee can act on.
- Put the four parts together in a comment of about 130 words in the Your draft box.
- Read your comment aloud with a timer. Stop at 60 seconds.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- The item
- Item 4, turning off the court lights at 8 p.m.
- What I saw
- Twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9.
- Why it matters
- Many people work late, so after 8 is when they can play.
- What I ask
- Keep the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays.
- My time limit
- 60 seconds
Sample draft: Your comment, about 130 words
Sample answer Grades 6–8
Good evening. My name is Gia, and 1 I’m here about item 4, the plan to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. I play on the courts after my café shifts. On weekday evenings, 2 I counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work late, so after 8 is the only time we can play. I know some neighbors are worried about noise. 3 Please keep the court lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays this summer. Thank you.
- Names the item and the exact proposal first.
- Gives one observation with numbers and times.
- Makes one request the committee can act on.
Check your work questions
- Does your first sentence name item 4?
- Does your comment share one observation from Gia?
- Does it make one clear request?
- Does it fit in 60 seconds when you read it aloud?
- One change I made
- I changed “don’t close the park” to “keep the lights on until 9” because item 4 is about the lights.
My take: sample answers
- I think Gia should ___ because ___.
- I think Gia should ask for lights until 9 on weekdays because the committee can act on that.
- The evidence that changed my first guess is ___.
- The evidence that changed my first guess is the agenda. Item 4 is about the lights, not closing the park.
- One question I still have is ___.
- One question I still have is how many people complained about the noise.
Grades 9–10
Cut Gia’s long draft into a 90-second comment, then write a note explaining what you cut and why.
Students make: 90-second comment plus a 100-word cutting note.
Steps students follow
- Reread Gia’s draft in Evidence C and item 4 in Evidence A.
- Sort each part of the draft into Keep or Cut in the planner.
- Rewrite the comment so Gia can read it aloud in 90 seconds or less.
- Keep four parts: the item, one observation, why it matters and one request.
- Leave out private details about other people.
- Write a cutting note of about 100 words that gives a reason for each cut.
- Time the comment aloud with a partner.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Keep
- Item 4 and the 8 p.m. lights. The count of twenty to thirty people. People work late. One request.
- Cut
- “Don’t close the park.” The friend’s private situation. Page two about the bus. The line about never listening.
- Gia’s request in one sentence
- Keep the court lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer.
Sample draft: Gia’s 90-second comment
Sample answer Grades 9–10
Good evening. I’m Gia, and I live two blocks from the park. 1 I’m commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. I play there after café shifts. On weekday evenings, I’ve counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening, so after 8 is when we can play. 2 I understand the concern about noise from nearby residents. I’m asking the committee to recommend keeping the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. Thank you.
- Names the item and the exact proposal in the first lines.
- Acknowledges another perspective in one sentence.
Sample draft: Cutting note, about 100 words
Sample answer Grades 9–10
I cut “Please don’t close the park,” because item 4 turns off the lights at 8 p.m. It does not close the park. I cut the part about Gia’s friend. 1 It is her friend’s private story, and comments go on the public record. I kept the point that many people work late. I cut page two about the bus, because the parks committee cannot change bus routes. I cut the line about never listening to young people, 2 because it asks the committee for nothing. I kept Gia’s count, because she saw it herself.
- Explains a cut by privacy, not only by time.
- Explains a cut by purpose.
Check your work questions
- Does the comment keep the item, one observation, why it matters and one request?
- Did you remove private details about other people?
- Does the comment still sound like Gia?
- Does your cutting note give a reason for each cut?
- One change I made after feedback
- I changed “my friend works late” to “many of us work until evening,” because the friend did not ask to be on the public record.
My take: sample answers
- My claim: ___.
- Gia should name item 4, share her count of people on the courts and ask for lights until 9 on weekdays.
- The best evidence is ___, because ___.
- The agenda, because it shows item 4 is about the lights and that the committee only recommends.
- Someone who disagrees might say ___.
- The noise is a real problem for families nearby, so the lights should go off at 8.
- I would change my mind if ___.
- The resident showed that the noise starts well before 9 p.m.
Grades 11–12
Find a real upcoming local meeting agenda with an adult, choose an item and write a comment you could submit (submitting is optional).
Students make: Written comment (200–250 words) plus a 100-word process note.
Steps students follow
- Open the website of your city council, school board or parks board with a trusted adult.
- Find the next meeting agenda and choose one item that affects you.
- Fill in the planner: the body, the item, the action and the comment rules.
- Decide whether this body can act on your request. If not, name the body that can.
- Write a comment of 200 to 250 words on the Your draft page.
- Write a process note of about 100 words that names your next step.
- Leave out addresses, phone numbers and anyone else’s private story.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- The body, the item and the action
- Parks committee, item 4, evening court hours. Action: a recommendation to the full council.
- The comment rules
- Sign up by 5:00 p.m. Two minutes to speak. Written comments before the meeting. Names are public.
- Can this body act on my request?
- Yes for court hours, which the committee can recommend. No for the bus, which belongs with the body that runs bus routes.
Sample draft: Your comment, 200 to 250 words
Sample answer Grades 11–12
Good evening, members of the parks committee. My name is Gia. 1 I’m commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights and close the lighted courts at 8:00 p.m. I play on those courts after my café shifts. On weekday evenings, I have counted twenty to thirty people using the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening, so that hour is the only time we can play. I also read the written comment from a nearby family. They like the courts, but late noise carries into their apartment, and their kids have school in the morning. 2 That concern is fair, and I do not want to dismiss it. I’m asking the committee to recommend keeping the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. I also ask the committee to review when the noise happens before it recommends any permanent change. Thank you for your time.
- Names the item first. The sample uses item 4 in Gia’s voice; students name their own body and item.
- Acknowledges another group’s concern before the request.
Sample draft: Process note, about 100 words
Sample answer Grades 11–12
The parks committee can recommend court hours, so item 4 is the right place for this request. The committee does not decide the final outcome. 1 Its recommendation goes to the full council, so my next step is a written comment to the council before it acts. My bus request does not belong here, because the parks committee cannot change bus routes. I will find the agenda of the body that runs the buses. I left out my address and my friend’s situation, 2 because comments and names become part of the public record.
- Follows the decision past the committee to the next route.
- Handles personal information on purpose.
Check your work questions
- Does your comment name the body, the item and the action?
- Does it make one specific request the body can act on?
- Does your process note name the next body or step?
- Did you leave out addresses, phone numbers and other people’s private stories?
- One change I made after feedback
- I removed my bus request from the comment and named the right body in my process note, because the parks committee cannot act on buses.
My take: sample answers
- My claim: ___.
- Gia should name item 4, give one observation, acknowledge the noise concern and make one request.
- The best evidence is ___, because ___.
- The agenda, because its action line shows the committee recommends and the full council decides.
- Someone who disagrees might say ___.
- Gia should skip the meeting and write to the full council, which makes the final decision.
- The limit of the evidence is ___.
- No document says how many residents complained or when the noise happens.
- I would change my mind if ___.
- The complaints showed that the noise starts before 9 p.m. on weekdays.
College and community
Prepare the crew’s input on item 4 as a small community group. Write a two-minute spoken comment for the parks committee and a follow-up email to the full council, which receives the committee’s recommendation.
Students make: Spoken comment, 2 minutes (about 260 words), plus a follow-up email of 120–180 words.
Steps students follow
- Reread Evidence A and B. Note the item, the time limit and who decides after the committee.
- Reread the resident’s comment in Evidence D. Plan one request that answers it.
- Outline the comment: item, who you are, what you saw, why it matters and the request.
- Write a spoken comment of two minutes or less on the Your draft page.
- Read it aloud with a partner and a timer. Cut until it fits.
- Start the follow-up email on the Your draft page. Finish it, 120 to 180 words, on lined paper.
- Check both texts against the public-record checklist.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Who hears it, and who decides
- The parks committee hears the comment and recommends. The full council decides.
- Comment outline
- Item 4. A small group of court users. Twenty to thirty people between 8 and 9 on weekdays. Many work late. Lights until 9 on weekdays this summer.
- How the request answers the resident
- The lights go off at 9, and the committee reviews when the noise happens.
Sample draft: Spoken comment, two minutes or less
Sample answer College and community
Good evening, members of the parks committee. I’m Gia, and I’m speaking for a small group of friends who use the park. 1 We are commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights and close the lighted courts at 8:00 p.m. On weekday evenings, I have counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening, so that hour is when we can play. We also read the written comment from a nearby resident. The courts are good for the neighborhood, the resident wrote, but late noise carries into an apartment where kids have school in the morning. 2 That is a fair concern. We ask the committee to recommend keeping the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. 3 We also ask the committee to review when the noise happens before it recommends any permanent change. Thank you.
- Names the item in the first lines.
- Acknowledges the resident before making the request.
- Answers the noise concern with a specific request.
Sample draft: Follow-up email to the full council: first paragraph
Sample answer College and community
Dear council members, I spoke at the parks committee meeting on Tuesday about item 4. It proposes turning off the court lights at 8 p.m. 1 The committee’s recommendation now comes to you for final action. We asked for lights until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer and a review of when the noise happens.
- Sends the follow-up to the body that decides after the committee.
Check your work questions
- Does your comment name item 4 and fit in two minutes when read aloud?
- Does your request respond to the resident’s noise concern?
- Is your email addressed to the full council, the body that decides?
- Did you leave out addresses, phone numbers and anyone else’s private story?
- One change I made after the timed reading
- I cut the sentence about the bus, because the parks committee cannot act on it and the comment ran over two minutes.
My take: sample answers
- My claim: ___.
- The group should speak on item 4 tonight and write to the full council, because the decision happens in two stages.
- The best evidence is ___, because ___.
- The comment rules, because they set the time limit, the written route and the public record.
- Someone who disagrees might say ___.
- A two-minute comment rarely changes a recommendation, so the group should spend its time elsewhere.
- The limit of the evidence is ___.
- No document shows how the full council usually treats the committee’s recommendations.
- I would change my mind if ___.
- The committee had already decided before the meeting and did not read written comments.
Sample task answers for each grade band are in the educator edition for that band.
Evidence answers
Sample answers for the two boxes under each document in the student edition. Grades 6–8 students write one question they still have instead of what the document leaves out.
Evidence A Item 4 on the parks committee agenda
Look closely: Circle the item number, the proposed time and the action.
| Grade band | What it shows | What it leaves out |
|---|---|---|
| Grades 6–8 | Item 4 would turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. | One question: How many people complained about the noise? |
| Grades 9–10 | Item 4 is only about the court lights and closing time. The committee only recommends. | How many residents complained, and whether other closing times were considered. |
| Grades 11–12 | A proposal about lights and hours only. The committee recommends; the council decides. | How many complaints there were, when the noise happens and any other hours considered. |
| College and community | One item, one proposal and one action: a recommendation to the full council. | How many residents complained, and whether the committee weighed other closing times. |
Evidence B How to comment at the meeting
Look closely: Underline the deadline, the time limit and what becomes public.
| Grade band | What it shows | What it leaves out |
|---|---|---|
| Grades 6–8 | Each speaker gets 2 minutes. People can also send a written comment. | One question: Who can read the comments after the meeting? |
| Grades 9–10 | Sign up by 5:00 p.m., 2 minutes to speak, a written option, and names go public. | How the full council usually treats the committee’s recommendation. |
| Grades 11–12 | A deadline, a time limit, a written route and a public record for every comment. | How the full council usually treats committee recommendations. |
| College and community | Two ways in, speaking for 2 minutes or writing ahead, and both go on the record. | How much weight the full council gives the committee’s recommendation. |
Evidence C Gia’s three-page draft (excerpt)
Look closely: Find the request. Does it match what item 4 proposes?
| Grade band | What it shows | What it leaves out |
|---|---|---|
| Grades 9–10 | Gia cares about the park. Her request is “Please don’t close the park.” | The item number, the court lights and 8 p.m. Item 4 does not close the park. |
| Grades 11–12 | Strong feeling and a request, “Please don’t close the park,” that misstates item 4. | The item, the lights and the 8 p.m. time, and any observation the committee can use. |
| College and community | A sincere draft whose request answers a proposal that is not on the agenda. | Item 4’s real proposal, the 8 p.m. time and any specific observation. |
Evidence D A comment from a nearby resident
Look closely: What does this resident like, and what is the problem?
| Grade band | What it shows | What it leaves out |
|---|---|---|
| Grades 9–10 | This resident likes the courts but hears late noise at home. Their kids have school. | What time the noise becomes a problem for this family. |
| Grades 11–12 | A family that values the courts but hears late-evening noise, with kids who have school. | When the noise starts to bother them, which matters for any middle-ground hours. |
| College and community | An opposing interest stated fairly: the courts help, but late noise reaches home. | When the noise becomes a problem, so nobody knows whether 9 p.m. would work. |
Practice answers
The feedback students see for each choice on the student page.
Gia has two minutes on item 4. Which opening sentence gives the committee the most to work with?
Why the best answer is best, by grade band
- Grades 6–8
- B. It names item 4 and the lights at 8 p.m., so the committee knows right away what Gia is talking about.
- Grades 9–10
- B. It names the item and the exact proposal. A gets the proposal wrong, and C uses up time without asking for anything.
- Grades 11–12
- B. A misstates item 4, which can make listeners doubt the rest. C may feel true but gives the committee nothing to act on.
- College and community
- B. In a two-minute slot, the first sentence should tell the committee which decision the comment is about. A and C spend that time elsewhere.
Whose perspective is missing?
Prompt: Whose view is missing from these documents? What would you ask them?
- Grades 6–8
- Court users who work late are missing. I would ask them what time they usually play.
- Grades 9–10
- The committee’s view is missing. I would ask whether it looked at other closing times, such as 9 p.m.
- Grades 11–12
- Court users who cannot attend a 6 p.m. meeting. I would ask whether they know they can send a written comment before the meeting.
- College and community
- The full council’s view is missing. I would ask how it usually treats the committee’s recommendations on park hours.
Discussion answers
The numbers match the questions to discuss on the student page. Each sample answer is what a strong student in that grade band might say.
The parks committee cannot fix the bus problem. Who should get that question instead?
Heat check: Low- Grades 6–8
- The office or board in charge of the buses. Gia could look up its meeting and its comment rules.
- Grades 9–10
- The body whose job includes bus routes. Gia would need its agenda and comment rules, the same steps as for item 4.
- Grades 11–12
- The body with bus routes in its remit. Gia should find its agenda and rules and keep the bus out of her parks comment.
- College and community
- The body with bus routes in its remit. Sending the question there saves both meetings’ time and gives it a chance of action.
How could Gia’s comment respond to the resident’s concern about noise?
Heat check: MediumWhy: Students may side with young people or with neighbors and describe either group unfairly. Cool-down: Reread the resident’s comment aloud. Ask what this family needs, in their own words, before anyone answers.
- Grades 9–10
- Gia could say she understands the noise concern and ask for lights until 9 on weekdays, not later.
- Grades 11–12
- She could name the concern in one sentence, then ask for 9 p.m. on weekdays and a review of when the noise happens.
- College and community
- By stating the concern fairly first. An end time of 9 p.m. and a review of the complaints give both sides part of what they need.
What does Gia get from speaking, even if the committee recommends turning off the lights?
Heat check: Low- Grades 6–8
- Her comment goes on the record, so the committee knows people use the courts after 8.
- Grades 11–12
- Her count goes on the public record, she can follow the item to the full council, and she learns how the process works.
- College and community
- The committee hears about a use it might not know. Her count stays on the record, and she can still write to the full council.
Court users who work late may miss a 6 p.m. meeting. How could their views reach the committee?
Heat check: Low- Grades 6–8
- They could send a written comment before the meeting. The rules allow that.
- Grades 9–10
- Through written comments before the meeting, which the rules allow. Gia could also tell other court users about item 4.
- Grades 11–12
- Through written comments before the meeting. The committee could make that option easier to find, since commenters often do not reflect the whole community.
- College and community
- Through written comments sent ahead. Einstein, Palmer and Glick found commenters often do not reflect the whole community, so the committee should not assume they do.
Sample explanation
One way a student could explain the case in plain words:
I’m commenting on this agenda item. Here is what I observed, why it matters and the question I’d like you to address.
En español: Comento sobre este punto de la agenda. Esto fue lo que observé, por qué importa y la pregunta que quisiera que atendieran.
Annotated student draft
Prompt: Write Gia’s 90-second comment to the parks committee.
First draft
Hi, my name is Gia and 1 I have lived in this neighborhood my whole life. The park is really important to everyone and 2 closing it is a terrible idea. I go there all the time with my friends and it’s one of the only free things to do around here. My friend works late and this is the only time she can play and 3 she’s been going through a lot at home. 4 You guys never listen to young people. 5 Please don’t close the park.
- Strength. Good: it establishes a stake. Keep it short.
- Evidence. The item closes the lit courts at 8 p.m., not the park. Be precise.
- Audience. Private and permanent in the record. Leave it out unless she chooses to share.
- Revise. Understandable, but it gives the committee nothing to act on.
- Revise. Name the exact request: keep courts lit until 9 on weekdays?
Revised draft
Good evening. I’m Gia Brooks-Romano, and I live two blocks from the park. I’m commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. I play there after café shifts, and on weekday evenings I’ve counted twenty to thirty people using the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening. I understand the concern about noise from nearby residents. I’m asking the committee to keep the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer and to review noise complaints before making a permanent change. Thank you.
Rubric
Score each row. Proficient is the target for most students.
| Criterion | Beginning | Developing | Proficient | Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence | No facts. | General claim about importance. | One specific observation tied to the item. | Observation plus acknowledgment of another perspective. |
| Reasoning | Attacks the body. | States a feeling only. | Explains why the change matters. | Weighs the concern and offers a middle path. |
| Audience & purpose | Wrong body or no request. | Request is vague. | Names the item and a specific request. | Request fits the body’s remit and includes a follow-up. |
| Revision | No change. | Shortens only. | Removes private details and adds a request. | Explains each cut in terms of time, privacy and purpose. |
Support and challenge
Support
- Provide the agenda with item 4 highlighted
- Offer a written comment in place of speaking
- Spanish vocabulary: orden del día, comentario público, petición
- Allow students to record their comment for practice
- Reduce to a 45-second comment
Supports written for each grade band:
Grades 6–8
- Four-box organizer: item, what I saw, why it matters, what I ask
- Frames: “I’m here about item __. I noticed __.”
- Timer practice
- Option to submit in writing
Grades 9–10
- Cutting checklist
- Model before-and-after paragraph
Grades 11–12
- Agenda-reading guide
- Comment template
- Public-record checklist
College and community
- Comment outline: item, who you are, what you saw, why it matters, the request
- Timer and a read-aloud rehearsal with a partner
- Public-record checklist from the comment instructions
Challenge
- Compare comment rules for two different local bodies
- Track a real agenda item from discussion to vote
- Grades 6–8
- Add one fact from the agenda to support your point.
- Grades 9–10
- Keep Gia’s voice while removing private information and off-topic points.
- Grades 11–12
- Explain whether the body you chose can act on your request, and where to go if it can’t.
- College and community
- Answer the resident’s concern about late noise with a specific request the committee could recommend. One example is Gia’s request to keep the courts lit until 9 on weekdays through the summer.
More extension prompts
These activities are not on the student page. Use them for students who finish early or want a different angle.
- Trace it to the source Journalism
- Keep your observation, the public record and your recommendation distinct.
- Compare the options Public policy
- What assumption in the proposal does your evidence help examine?
- Reflect on your thinking Learning
- After a rehearsal, revise one claim that went beyond what your source supports.
Try it at your school
Find your next local agenda.
- With a trusted adult, find the website for your city council, school board or parks board
- Open the next meeting agenda and find one item that affects you
- Read the public-comment instructions: sign-up, time limit, written option
- Draft a practice comment and decide with your adult whether to submit it
Who to ask Clerk of the council or school board, a civics teacher, a student representative to the board if your district has one
Stay safe Public comments and names may be published. Leave out addresses, phone numbers and anyone else’s private story. Attend meetings with a trusted adult.
Classroom resources
Free outside resources we checked for this case. Watch, Try and Read items work for students. Teach items are for you and stay off the student pages. Preview a link before you use it with a class.
Watch
Short videos to show in class or assign.
Students and educators HHS Office of Research Integrity
Submitting a Comment at Regulations.gov
Walk through finding a docket and submitting a written comment to a federal agency.
- Ages 16–24
Also on the student page, under Explore more.
Watch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)Read
Articles, official pages and case records.
Students and educators Seattle City Council
Tips on Giving Public Comment
A city’s own tips for a short, focused comment: name, one ask and the agenda item.
- Grades 6–8
- Grades 9–12
- Ages 16–24
Also on the student page, under Explore more.
Open on seattle.gov (opens in a new tab)Students and educators Regulations.gov (U.S. General Services Administration)
Commenting Guidance
Learn what makes a comment useful to the agency that must act on it.
- Grades 9–12
- Ages 16–24
U.S. government work; public domain.
Also on the student page, under Explore more.
Open on regulations.gov (opens in a new tab)Links checked September 25, 2026.
Standards
Common Core codes come from our standards map for this case. Each code links to the official standard. The C3 row names what students do for each code. The College and community row names the AAC&U VALUE rubrics and ACRL Framework frames the task practices. AAC&U says VALUE rubrics are for reviewing learning across a college, not for grading, so score the task with the case rubric.
| Grade | What students do | Standards |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | Write and practice a 60-second comment for the parks committee about the court hours. Students make: 60-second comment (about 130 words). | RI.6.1 (opens in a new tab) W.6.1 (opens in a new tab) W.6.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.6.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.6.1.d (opens in a new tab) |
| Grade 7 | RI.7.1 (opens in a new tab) W.7.1 (opens in a new tab) W.7.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.7.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.7.1.d (opens in a new tab) | |
| Grade 8 | RI.8.1 (opens in a new tab) W.8.1 (opens in a new tab) W.8.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.8.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.8.1.d (opens in a new tab) | |
| Grades 9–10 | Cut Gia’s long draft into a 90-second comment, then write a note explaining what you cut and why. Students make: 90-second comment plus a 100-word cutting note. | RI.9-10.1 (opens in a new tab) W.9-10.1 (opens in a new tab) W.9-10.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.9-10.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.9-10.1.d (opens in a new tab) |
| Grades 11–12 | Find a real upcoming local meeting agenda with an adult, choose an item and write a comment you could submit (submitting is optional). Students make: Written comment (200–250 words) plus a 100-word process note. | RI.11-12.1 (opens in a new tab) W.11-12.1 (opens in a new tab) W.11-12.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.11-12.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.11-12.1.d (opens in a new tab) |
| College and community | Prepare the crew’s input on item 4 as a small community group. Write a two-minute spoken comment for the parks committee and a follow-up email to the full council, which receives the committee’s recommendation. Students make: Spoken comment, 2 minutes (about 260 words), plus a follow-up email of 120–180 words. |
|
| Social studies (C3) |
| D2.Civ.2.6-8 (opens in a new tab) D2.Civ.9.9-12 (opens in a new tab) D2.Civ.1.9-12 (opens in a new tab) D4.8.9-12 (opens in a new tab) |
What each standard means
RI.6.1- Use evidence from the text to support what it says directly and what you can infer from it.
W.6.1- Write an argument for a claim, backed by clear reasons and relevant evidence.
W.6.5- With help from peers and adults, strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing or rewriting.
SL.6.1.c- Ask and answer specific questions with details that add to the discussion.
SL.6.1.d- Review the main ideas of a discussion and show you understand other views by reflecting and paraphrasing.
RI.7.1- Use several pieces of evidence from the text to support what it says directly and what you can infer.
W.7.1- Write an argument for a claim, backed by clear reasons and relevant evidence.
W.7.5- With help from peers and adults, strengthen writing by planning and revising, focusing on purpose and audience.
SL.7.1.c- Ask questions that draw out more detail, and respond with relevant ideas that bring the discussion back on topic.
SL.7.1.d- Take in new information from others and change your view when the evidence calls for it.
RI.8.1- Use the evidence that most strongly supports your analysis of what a text says and implies.
W.8.1- Write an argument for a claim, backed by clear reasons and relevant evidence.
W.8.5- With help from peers and adults, strengthen writing by planning and revising, focusing on purpose and audience.
SL.8.1.c- Ask questions that connect several speakers’ ideas, and respond with relevant evidence and observations.
SL.8.1.d- Take in new information from others and qualify or defend your view based on the evidence.
RI.9-10.1- Support an analysis with solid, complete evidence from the text, both for what it states and for what it implies.
W.9-10.1- Write arguments that analyze substantial topics or texts, using valid reasoning and enough relevant evidence.
W.9-10.5- Strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing or rewriting, focusing on what matters most for the purpose and audience.
SL.9-10.1.c- Move a discussion forward with questions that connect it to larger ideas, bring others in and test ideas and conclusions.
SL.9-10.1.d- Respond to different views, sum up where people agree and disagree, and adjust your view when the evidence calls for it.
RI.11-12.1- Back up an analysis with the strongest evidence from the text, including where the text leaves things uncertain.
W.11-12.1- Write arguments that analyze substantial topics or texts, using valid reasoning and enough relevant evidence.
W.11-12.5- Strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing or rewriting, focusing on what matters most for the purpose and audience.
SL.11-12.1.c- Keep a discussion moving with questions that probe reasoning and evidence, and make sure the full range of views is heard.
SL.11-12.1.d- Respond to different views, pull together what each side says, resolve conflicts where possible and name what still needs research.
D2.Civ.2.6-8- Explain the roles citizens play, such as voters, jurors, taxpayers, petitioners and protesters.
D2.Civ.9.9-12- Use fitting deliberative processes in different settings.
D2.Civ.1.9-12- Tell apart the powers and responsibilities of local, state, tribal, national and international institutions.
D4.8.9-12- Use deliberative and democratic strategies and procedures to make decisions and act at school and in the community.
Civic Engagement VALUE Rubric- AAC&U’s rubric for taking part in community life, including civic communication and working within community structures toward a civic aim. In this case: Students speak to the body that can act on the item and follow the decision to the full council.
Oral Communication VALUE Rubric- AAC&U’s rubric for a prepared talk with a clear central message, organization, supporting material and delivery. In this case: Students deliver a timed comment with one central message and one supporting observation.
Written Communication VALUE Rubric- AAC&U’s rubric for writing that fits its context and purpose, develops its content and uses sources and evidence. In this case: Students write a follow-up email for a different audience than the spoken comment.
Scholarship as Conversation- Experts and communities build knowledge over time through ongoing discussion and disagreement. In this case: Students use research on who comments at local meetings (Einstein, Palmer and Glick, 2018) to decide whose view their comment should acknowledge.
Plain wording is our paraphrase. The official text is at each link.
Course versions
Each course version changes what students read, make and show. The names are the official course names.
Open your course to see its task.
Honors (set by your school)
Task: Argue whether public comment is an effective form of participation, using this case and one real meeting you watch.
- Students make
- Argument, 550–650 words.
- Assess
- The argument is judged on the quality of its observed evidence and the feasibility of its reform, not on length.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Watch a recorded local meeting. Log who spoke, for how long and what the body did next.
- Reread Evidence A, B and D. Note what public comment can and cannot do here.
- Fill in the claim and counterclaim chart.
- Write a qualified thesis on whether public comment works.
- Draft your thesis paragraph and counterargument paragraph on the Your draft page.
- Propose one change to comment rules, and explain whether it is realistic.
- Finish the argument, 550 to 650 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Thesis
- Public comment works best when a speaker names the item and makes a request the body can act on. It reaches only people who can attend or write in.
- The strongest objection
- The people most affected, such as shift workers and young people, are least able to attend, so comment can amplify the already heard.
- My reform, and whether it is realistic
- Accept short recorded comments along with written ones, and post how many comments came in. It costs staff time but needs no new meeting.
Sample draft: Thesis paragraph
Sample answer Honors (set by your school)
Gia has two minutes to speak on item 4, a proposal to turn off the park’s court lights at 8 p.m. Her first draft ran three pages. It asked the committee not to close a park that no one proposed closing. A revised comment names the item and shares her count of twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. It asks for lights until 9 on weekdays. That version gives the committee a request it can recommend. 1 Public comment works best when a speaker names the item and makes a request the body can act on. It is weakest at reaching people who cannot come at 6 p.m.
- States a qualified claim.
Sample draft: Counterargument paragraph
Sample answer Honors (set by your school)
The strongest objection is that public comment amplifies people who are already heard. Einstein, Palmer and Glick studied meeting records and found that 1 commenters often do not reflect the whole community. Court users who work late are the people item 4 affects most, and a 6 p.m. meeting is hard for them to attend. This objection is serious, but 2 it argues for widening the process, not ending it. The comment rules already allow written comments before the meeting. The committee could also accept short recorded comments and post how many comments it received. 3 Those changes cost staff time, but they would let more affected people reach the room.
- Uses published research as evidence for the objection.
- Answers the objection instead of dismissing it.
- Addresses feasibility.
Check your work questions
- Does your thesis state a qualified position?
- Do you use evidence from the meeting you watched?
- Do you answer the strongest objection?
- Is your proposed reform specific and realistic?
- One change I made after feedback
- I replaced my claim that public comment never works with a claim about when it works, because one meeting cannot show that.
This case in the Honors (set by your school) educator edition
Open on screen Print this casePre-AP English 1 and Pre-AP English 2
Task: Closely read the comment instructions and agenda item, then rehearse Gia’s comment in an academic conversation where listeners must restate her request.
- Students make
- Revised 90-second comment plus a listener log.
- Assess
- The comment is scored for exact use of the instructions, a request two listeners restate the same way, one observation used as evidence and a documented revision.
- Course skills
- Close observation and analysis, Academic conversation, Evidence-based writing.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Read the comment rules in Evidence B line by line.
- Log the deadline, the time limit, the written option and the public-record rule.
- Read item 4 in Evidence A and log its action type.
- Revise Gia’s comment so she can read it aloud in 90 seconds.
- Read it to two listeners. Each one restates the request with “I heard your request as…”.
- Revise until both listeners restate the request the same way.
- Record each listener’s words and your change on the Check your work page.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Sign-up deadline
- 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting
- Time limit
- 2 minutes per speaker
- Written option
- Written comments may be sent in before the meeting.
- Public record
- Comments and speakers’ names become public.
- Action type for item 4
- A committee recommendation to the full council, not a final decision.
Sample draft: Revised comment, 90 seconds
Sample answer Pre-AP English 1 and Pre-AP English 2
Good evening. I’m Gia, and 1 I’m commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. I play there after café shifts. On weekday evenings, 2 I’ve counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening, so that hour is our time to play. I know nearby residents have complained about evening noise. 3 My request is one sentence: please recommend keeping the court lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. Thank you.
- Uses the agenda’s item number and proposal exactly.
- One observation used as evidence.
- Signals the request, so listeners can restate it.
Check your work questions
- Does your comment follow the instructions exactly?
- Did two listeners restate your request the same way?
- Do you use one observation as evidence?
- Did you record what you changed and why?
- Listener 1 heard
- I heard your request as keeping the courts open later this summer.
- Listener 2 heard
- I heard your request as keeping the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays.
- What I changed, and why
- I added “until 9 p.m. on weekdays” and gave the request its own sentence, because Listener 1 missed the hours.
This case in the Pre-AP English 1 and Pre-AP English 2 educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseAP English Language and Composition
Task: Analyze how two sample comments to the committee use rhetorical choices, then write your own.
- Students make
- Analysis (about 350 words) plus a 90-second comment.
- Assess
- The analysis receives practice feedback on the three AP Lang scoring rows, and the student’s own comment is checked for applying what the analysis found.
- Course skills
- Rhetorical Situation (RHS), Reasoning and Organization (REO), Style (STL).
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Read the two sample comments. Fill in the comparison chart for each one.
- Note how the two-minute limit and the formal setting shape each comment.
- Write a thesis about how these constraints shape effective choices.
- Draft your thesis and first body paragraph, about 350 words in all, on the Your draft page.
- Write your own 90-second comment on item 4 that applies your analysis.
- Ask a peer to time it. Cut about a fifth, then explain the cut in one sentence.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Comment 1: choices and effect
- Opens with feeling, “closing it is a terrible idea,” and blames the listeners. The committee hears no item and no request it can act on.
- Comment 2: choices and effect
- Opens with the item number, gives a count and ends with hours and days. The committee could repeat the request back.
- Thesis
- A two-minute limit and a formal setting reward a speaker who names the decision first and saves feeling for one specific detail.
Sample draft: Your analysis: thesis and first body paragraph
Sample answer AP English Language and Composition
1 A two-minute limit and a formal setting reward a speaker who names the decision first and saves feeling for one specific detail. The first comment opens with “The park is really important to everyone and closing it is a terrible idea.” The claim is broad, and it misstates item 4, which turns off the lights at 8 p.m. It then turns on the listeners: “You guys never listen to young people.” That line may feel honest, but 2 it spends time on blame and gives the committee nothing to recommend. The second comment opens with the item number and the exact proposal. Its evidence is a count, “twenty to thirty people,” tied to the hour in question. 3 It even grants the other side: “I understand the concern about noise from nearby residents.” Each choice fits a listener who hears many speakers and must act on one item.
- The thesis explains how constraints shape choices.
- Commentary explains the effect of a specific line.
- Analyzes a choice in the second comment, not only the first.
Sample draft: Your 90-second comment on item 4
Sample answer AP English Language and Composition
Good evening. I’m Gia, and I’m commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. On weekday evenings, I’ve counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening. I understand that late noise reaches nearby apartments where kids have school in the morning. I ask the committee to recommend lights until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. 1 I also ask it to review when the noise happens before any permanent change. Thank you.
- The student’s own comment applies the analysis by answering the other side.
Check your work questions
- Does your thesis explain how the time limit and setting shape choices?
- Do you analyze specific choices in both comments?
- Does your own comment apply your analysis?
- Did you cut about a fifth and explain the cut?
- The cut that strengthened my line of reasoning
- I cut a sentence about how much I love the park, which let the request come sooner in the comment.
This case in the AP English Language and Composition educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseAP United States Government and Politics
Task: Argument essay: which form of participation is most effective for young people: voting, public comment, protest or joining an interest group?
- Students make
- Argument essay, 40 minutes.
- Assess
- Practice feedback follows the published Argument Essay expectations: a defensible claim, evidence from a foundational document and course concepts, reasoning and a response to an alternative view.
- Course skills
- Unit 5: Political Participation, Source Analysis, Argumentation.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Read the prompt: voting, public comment, protest or joining an interest group.
- Choose one form and write a defensible claim in the planner.
- Plan one reason from the case and one from the Letter from Birmingham Jail excerpt.
- Plan a response to an alternative view.
- Write the argument essay in 40 minutes. Start on the Your draft page.
- Explain how your choice works for people too young to vote.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Defensible claim
- Public comment is the most effective form of participation for young people, because it is open to people too young to vote.
- Evidence from the case
- A speaker gets two minutes on item 4 or can write before the meeting. A request for lights until 9 fits the committee’s remit.
- Alternative view, and my response
- Voting has more power. But many young people cannot vote yet, and a comment reaches one decision directly.
Sample draft: Your essay: claim and first body paragraph
Sample answer AP United States Government and Politics
Public comment is the most effective form of participation for young people, 1 because it is open to people too young to vote. Elections and interest groups are linkage institutions, but a voter must be old enough to vote, and a group speaks for its members. Public comment connects one person to one decision. The parks committee case shows how. Its agenda lists item 4, a proposal to turn off the court lights at 8 p.m. 2 The comment rules give each speaker two minutes. Anyone can also send a written comment before the meeting. A speaker does not need to be old enough to vote to use either route. Gia names the item and asks for lights until 9 on weekdays. That gives the committee a request it can recommend to the full council. That direct link can build 3 political efficacy, the sense that taking part can affect government. 4 It works only when the speaker understands the body’s remit. A bus complaint would go nowhere in this room, because the parks committee cannot change bus routes.
- States a defensible claim with a reason.
- Uses specific evidence from the case.
- Applies a course concept.
- Qualifies the claim. The next paragraph adds the Letter from Birmingham Jail excerpt.
Check your work questions
- Does your essay make a defensible claim?
- Do you use the Letter from Birmingham Jail excerpt accurately?
- Do you use the case as evidence?
- Do you respond to an alternative view?
- One change I made after feedback
- I added a sentence that explains how the foundational document supports my reasoning, because my draft only named it.
This case in the AP United States Government and Politics educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseAP Seminar
Task: Team multimedia presentation to a mock parks committee on the court-lights proposal, built from interviews with park users (with consent) and research on park use and noise.
- Students make
- 8-minute team presentation plus individual oral defense.
- Assess
- The presentation and oral defenses are scored with educator-adapted rubrics modeled on the published team presentation and defense criteria; this is practice, not a submitted performance task.
- Course skills
- Question and Explore, Evaluate Multiple Perspectives, Team, Transform, and Transmit.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Write a team research question about the court-lights proposal.
- Interview park users or neighbors, with consent. Log each interview.
- Research park use and noise in teacher-approved sources. Log each source.
- Draft a proposal the parks committee can recommend. Test it against both groups’ needs.
- Draft your section of the presentation script on the Your draft page.
- Present to a mock parks committee for 8 minutes as a team.
- Answer oral-defense questions about your sources on your own.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Team research question
- How can the parks committee keep the courts open for people who work late and answer residents’ noise concerns?
- Perspectives we need
- Court users who play after work, nearby residents with kids who have school, the parks committee and the full council.
- Is our proposal within the committee’s remit?
- Yes. Court hours are a recommendation the committee can make to the full council.
Sample draft: My section of the script: the proposal
Sample answer AP Seminar
Our proposal answers both groups named in the agenda item. Item 4 would turn off the court lights at 8 p.m., because nearby residents complained about evening noise. 1 That concern is serious. One resident wrote that late noise carries into an apartment where kids have school in the morning. The case also gives us a count from a court user. On weekday evenings, Gia counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of them work until evening. We recommend that the committee keep the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. We also recommend a review of the noise complaints, including the times they describe, before any permanent change. 2 This is within the committee’s remit, because it can recommend court hours to the full council. 3 It does not solve every problem, since buses and late shifts are outside this room. It protects an hour of play and gives residents a set end time.
- Represents the residents’ perspective fairly.
- Checks the proposal against what the body can do.
- Names a limit before the defense questions do.
Check your work questions
- Is your research question clear and answerable?
- Does your evidence include several perspectives?
- Is your proposal within the committee’s remit?
- Can you defend each source under questioning?
- One defense question I expect, and my answer
- Why trust one person’s count? It is a firsthand observation with times, and we tested it against our interview logs.
This case in the AP Seminar educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseOfficial course framework: College Board, AP Seminar course page (opens in a new tab)
Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program)
Task: Watch a recorded local public meeting and write a structured analysis of how participation works there: who spoke, what the body could decide and what happened next. Then deliver a 90-second comment on the court-lights item and write a short reflection on the difference between speaking and being heard.
- Students make
- Meeting analysis (400–500 words), a 90-second comment and a 150-word reflection.
- Assess
- The educator applies the school’s own pre-IB rubric for observation, speaking and reflection; no IB criteria, marks or grades are assigned.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Watch a recorded local meeting. Log each speaker, the time used, the topic and the response.
- Write a meeting analysis of 400 to 500 words on lined paper.
- Explain in the analysis what the body could decide and what it could not.
- Write a 90-second comment on item 4 on the Your draft page.
- Present the comment to a partner with a timer.
- Write a 150-word reflection on the difference between speaking and being heard.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- What the parks committee can and cannot decide
- It can recommend court hours to the full council. It cannot change bus routes, and the full council decides.
- One group whose views may never reach the meeting
- Court users who work during a 6 p.m. meeting. They could send written comments before the meeting.
Sample draft: Your 90-second comment on item 4
Sample answer Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program)
Good evening. I’m Gia, and 1 I’m commenting on item 4, the proposal to close the lighted courts at 8 p.m. I play there after café shifts. On weekday evenings, I’ve counted twenty to thirty people on the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening. I know the noise reaches some nearby apartments, and I don’t dismiss that. I ask the committee to recommend keeping the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. Thank you.
- Names an item within the committee’s remit.
Sample draft: Reflection, about 150 words
Sample answer Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program)
Speaking and being heard are different. At the parks committee, Gia can speak for two minutes, and her comment goes on the public record. 1 That guarantees a record, but not a response. The committee may still recommend turning off the lights, and the full council makes the final decision. Being heard means a listener could repeat her request and weigh it against the residents’ concern. A clear request makes that more likely, but it cannot promise it. Public comment also has a limit. It reaches only people who know about the item and can come at 6 p.m. or write before the meeting. 2 Court users who work late may never reach the room. So public comment is one route among several. A speaker can follow the item to the full council and look for people who were not there.
- Names a limit of public comment honestly.
- Identifies a group whose views are missing.
Check your work questions
- Does your analysis describe the meeting’s process accurately?
- Do you separate what the body can decide from what it cannot?
- Is your comment specific, timed and within the committee’s remit?
- Does your reflection name a limit of public comment?
- One change I made after feedback
- I rewrote my sentence saying the committee would listen, because speaking does not guarantee a response.
This case in the Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program) educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseIB Middle Years Programme (MYP)
Task: Investigate “How can young people influence local decisions?” and prepare a comment plus a reflection.
- Students make
- Comment plus 200-word reflection.
- Assess
- The educator uses Language and literature criteria C and D and Individuals and societies criterion C, applying the school’s own year-level descriptors.
- Course skills
- Language and Literature C: Producing text, Language and Literature D: Using language, Individuals and Societies C: Communicating.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Read the statement of inquiry. Underline the key concept and the global context.
- Research how the parks committee accepts comments, using Evidence A and B.
- Compare public comment with one other route, such as a youth council.
- Write a formal comment on item 4 that Gia could read aloud in two minutes.
- Rehearse the comment aloud with a timer.
- Write a reflection of about 200 words on your own voice in local decisions.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- Statement of inquiry
- Communities make fairer decisions when people shape clear, purposeful messages for the bodies that hold power.
- How the parks committee accepts comments
- Sign up by 5:00 p.m. to speak for 2 minutes, or send a written comment before the meeting. Names become public.
- Public comment compared with one other route
- Public comment lets anyone speak once, for two minutes, on one item. I would research whether my town has a youth council and how to join.
Sample draft: Your formal comment on item 4
Sample answer IB Middle Years Programme (MYP)
Good evening, members of the committee. My name is Gia. I am commenting on item 4, the proposal to turn off the court lights at 8:00 p.m. I play on these courts after my café shifts. On weekday evenings, I have counted twenty to thirty people using the courts between 8 and 9. Many of us work until evening. I understand the concern about noise from nearby residents. 1 I respectfully ask the committee to recommend keeping the lights on until 9 p.m. on weekdays through the summer. Thank you for your time.
- Uses a formal register for a committee audience (Criterion D).
Sample draft: Reflection, about 200 words
Sample answer IB Middle Years Programme (MYP)
Before this case, I thought influencing a local decision meant being loud. Gia’s first draft was three pages long, and it asked the committee not to close a park that no one planned to close. 1 Her comment became stronger when it matched the committee’s power. The parks committee can recommend court hours, so a request for lights until 9 is one it can act on. That connects to our statement of inquiry: a clear, purposeful message reaches the body that holds power. The global context, fairness and development, raises a harder question. 2 The meeting is at 6 p.m., and people who work late may not be able to come. Written comments help, but only if people know about the item in time. My own voice counts most when I know which body decides, what it can do and how to reach it.
- Links the case to the statement of inquiry.
- Connects to the global context, fairness and development.
Check your work questions
- Does your comment use a formal register and fit in two minutes?
- Is your information about the comment process accurate?
- Does your work compare public comment with another route?
- Does your reflection say what you learned about your own voice?
- One change I made after rehearsal
- I changed “Hi, my name is Gia” to a formal greeting, because the audience is a committee at a public meeting.
This case in the IB Middle Years Programme (MYP) educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseOfficial course framework: International Baccalaureate, MYP curriculum (opens in a new tab)
IB Diploma Programme: Global politics
Task: Carry out an engagement-project rehearsal on the court-lights item: frame the political issue, identify stakeholders (court users, nearby residents, the parks committee, the full council), hold one consented conversation with a park user or neighbor or observe a real public meeting with a trusted adult, and write a report on how power and legitimacy shape the decision, including whose voices are missing.
- Students make
- Engagement report, 800–1,000 words, with a stakeholder map and engagement log.
- Assess
- The educator gives practice feedback on issue framing, ethical engagement and conceptual analysis; the report is not an internal assessment submission and no IB marks are predicted.
- Course skills
- Global politics — key concepts: power and legitimacy.
Steps and sample answers
Steps students follow
- Frame the political issue in item 4 as one question.
- Map the stakeholders: court users, nearby residents, the parks committee and the full council.
- Hold one consented conversation with a park user or neighbor, or observe a meeting with a trusted adult.
- Record what you learned in the engagement log.
- Draft the power and legitimacy section on the Your draft page.
- Finish the report, 800 to 1,000 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
- Name the voices missing from your findings and the limits of your evidence.
Sample answers for the task boxes
- The political issue, framed as a question
- Who should shape the hours of a shared public space when users and neighbors want different hours?
- Stakeholders and their sources of power
- Court users: the right to comment. Residents: complaints on the record. Parks committee: the recommendation. Full council: the final action.
- Who can reach the meeting, and who cannot
- Anyone who signs up by 5:00 p.m. or writes before the meeting. People working at 6 p.m. may not reach it.
Sample draft: Power and legitimacy section
Sample answer IB Diploma Programme: Global politics
1 Power over item 4 is shared unevenly. The parks committee holds agenda power, because it decides what to recommend on evening court hours. The full council holds the final decision. Nearby residents have already shaped the item, since their complaints about evening noise are its stated background. Court users hold a weaker form of power: the right to speak for two minutes or to send a written comment. 2 Legitimacy is a separate question. A recommendation made after public comment can claim more legitimacy, because affected people had a chance to be heard. That claim is only as strong as the access behind it. The meeting is at 6 p.m., and speakers must sign up by 5:00 p.m. Many court users work late, Gia says, so they may never reach the room. Einstein, Palmer and Glick found that 3 commenters often do not reflect the whole community. So a recommendation would be more legitimate if the committee showed it heard from both sides, including people who wrote in. My conversation is one data point, 4 so I treat it as a lead, not proof.
- Makes a claim about power, not only a description.
- Keeps the two core concepts distinct.
- Uses research to test the legitimacy claim.
- Names a limit of the student’s own findings.
Check your work questions
- Does your report frame a real local issue with competing interests?
- Did you engage people ethically and record what you learned?
- Do you analyze power and legitimacy with evidence?
- Do you name missing voices and the limits of your findings?
- One change I made after feedback
- I changed my claim that the process is unfair to a claim about who can reach it, because my evidence shows access, not intent.
This case in the IB Diploma Programme: Global politics educator edition
Open on screen Print this caseSteps and sample answers for each course are in the educator edition for that course.
Not recommended for this case
- IB Diploma Programme: Language A: language and literature
- The case’s texts are procedural (an agenda, instructions and a draft to cut), and its rhetorical work suits AP Language’s constrained-argument practice better than a Language A textual analysis; no literary work is involved.
Sources
Case sources
- Peacock, “Parks and Recreation (opens in a new tab).” No date listed. The show’s official streaming page. Full episodes may require a subscription.
- Seattle City Council, “Public Comment (opens in a new tab).” No date listed. One real city’s rules for spoken and written comments on agenda items.
Research behind the lesson
These are our teaching applications of the ideas below. For a rule or a fact, use the case sources.
- Jeong-Nam Kim and James E. Grunig, 2011. Situational theory of problem solving (opens in a new tab). Research article. How people recognize a problem, connect it to their lives and perceive barriers helps explain their communication about it. Keep in mind: A prompt for asking about people’s circumstances, not a way to infer someone’s beliefs from their identity.
- Cornell Legal Information Institute, No date listed. Authority and jurisdiction (opens in a new tab). Legal reference. Whether legal authority binds a decision-maker depends on the relevant jurisdiction and legal system. Keep in mind: This reference introduces a concept. The actual rule, jurisdiction, facts and current primary sources must be checked in each case.
Professional codes
- American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), ASPA Code of Ethics (opens in a new tab). Revised 2013. ASPA has promoted ethical standards for public servants since 1984.
- National Communication Association (NCA), Credo for Ethical Communication (opens in a new tab). Approved by the NCA Legislative Council in 1999; reaffirmed in 2011; reaffirmed with edits in 2017 and 2024.
- Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), SPJ Code of Ethics (opens in a new tab). Revised September 6, 2014, at SPJ's National Convention in Nashville, Tennessee.
Standards and course frameworks
- Common Core State Standards Initiative, English Language Arts Standards, Reading: Informational Text: grade 6 (opens in a new tab), grade 7 (opens in a new tab), grade 8 (opens in a new tab), grades 9–10 (opens in a new tab), grades 11–12 (opens in a new tab). Checked September 24, 2026.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative, English Language Arts Standards, Writing: grade 6 (opens in a new tab), grade 7 (opens in a new tab), grade 8 (opens in a new tab), grades 9–10 (opens in a new tab), grades 11–12 (opens in a new tab). Checked September 24, 2026.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative, English Language Arts Standards, Speaking and Listening: grade 6 (opens in a new tab), grade 7 (opens in a new tab), grade 8 (opens in a new tab), grades 9–10 (opens in a new tab), grades 11–12 (opens in a new tab). Checked September 24, 2026.
- National Council for the Social Studies, “College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework (opens in a new tab).” Checked September 25, 2026.
- College Board, Pre-AP shared principles and instructional practices (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
- College Board, AP English Language and Composition course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
- College Board, AP United States Government and Politics course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
- College Board, AP Seminar course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
- International Baccalaureate, MYP curriculum (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
- International Baccalaureate, Global politics course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
- American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), “VALUE Rubrics (opens in a new tab).” 2009. Checked September 25, 2026.
- Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), a division of the American Library Association, “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (opens in a new tab).” 2016. Checked September 25, 2026.
Margin notes
- A question to ask
- Who it affects
- A connection
- A next step
The companions are characters in the story. Their notes point to something to check or ask.
AP, Pre-AP and IB activities are practice designed by No, Pero Why?. They are not official College Board or IB materials. Honors expectations are set by your school. College tasks are practice designed by No, Pero Why?. They are not official materials from AAC&U, ACRL or any college, and no college has reviewed them. This guide gives general education, not legal advice.
