Lesson 18: Why is the theater curtain still falling apart? Educator guide

The district’s proposed budget is $48 million, the school theater curtain won’t close, and Dec wants to ask the school board about it.

  • Grades 6–12 and college
  • 45-minute lesson
  • 3 evidence documents
  • Lesson 18 of 20

Open the student page Printable pages

Dec operates the switch on the theater light circuit while Anika watches the glow and Mari shares his pleased look, with Pauta beside their open task.

Overview

Students read a short story in which the theater curtain at Dec and Anika’s school will not close. Meanwhile, a social post points to the district’s $48 million budget. Students label a proposed-budget excerpt by year, stage and units, explain why the post compares a total with a per-pupil figure and map who decides. They then write a budget question and a 60-second comment for the school board.

Key terms

Revenue

Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants. En español: ingresos

In this case: NCES reports that public schools get revenue from federal, state and local sources. That national data cannot show what Dec’s district spends on a curtain.

Expenditure

An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends. En español: gasto

In this case: The $48 million is a proposed plan for next school year. It lists planned expenditures, but none of that money has been spent yet.

Per-pupil amount

A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared. En español: monto por estudiante

In this case: $48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students = $15,000 per student. Westbrook’s $21,000 is already per student, but its year and stage are unknown.

Where this example applies

Do not publish stale national percentages as current local facts. The cited NCES table explicitly concerns school year 2022–23.

Grade levels, subjects and time

Grade levels
6–12, plus college and community groups.
Subjects
English language arts; also public policy and civics.
Time
45 minutes for the lesson steps on this page. The student page takes 20 to 30 minutes.

Learning objectives

Students will be able to:

  • label a budget document by year, stage and units;
  • explain why a district total and a per-pupil figure cannot be compared directly, and compute a comparable figure;
  • write a budget question that names a line, a deciding body and a request.

What students should already be able to do

The student edition for each grade band assumes students can already:

Grades 6–8
find a label on a document; tell a total from an amount for each person; write a polite question.
Grades 9–10
divide a total by a count; summarize a short source accurately; write a short post for a named audience.
Grades 11–12
explain federal, state and local roles in school funding; define a criterion and apply it to examples; write a structured policy brief.
College and community
read a document’s year, stage and units; divide a total by a count and label the result; write for a general news audience.

Skills, terms and roles

New skill

Compare numbers on the same scale

Turn totals into the same unit, such as dollars per student, before comparing two budgets.

Skills students use again

  • Read a pay statement line by line (Lesson 5). You read the budget one labeled line at a time.
  • Compare two cases on the same terms (Lesson 11). You compare two districts only after putting them on the same scale.
  • Count a starting point before you claim a change works (Lesson 13). The claim stays as small as the numbers.

Key terms

New in this case
Revenue, Expenditure, Per-pupil amount
From earlier cases
Proposal (Lesson 4), Decision-maker (Lesson 4)

Character spotlight

Mari leads. Mari reads the labels on the budget before she reacts to the big number.

  • Dec: He pulls the curtain at every show and brings what he can show: the curtain, his photo and the $6,800 quote.
  • Anika: She is on the theater crew with Dec.

The student’s role

You’re the one who works out the per-student number before anyone repeats the post.

Materials

Evidence handout

Evidence A Budget excerpt

The proposed budget for next school year

PROPOSED BUDGET, NEXT SCHOOL YEAR. Total proposed budget: $48,000,000. Projected enrollment: 3,200 students. Facilities, building repairs (all schools): $310,000. Note: figures are proposed and may change before the board adopts the budget.

What it shows: The proposed total for next year is $48 million for 3,200 students. Building repairs for all schools get $310,000.

What it leaves out: What the district spent this year, and whether a stage curtain counts as a building repair.

Ask: Circle the year, the stage and the unit for each number.

Evidence B Social media post

A post shared Tuesday at 6:10 p.m.

“Our district: $48 MILLION. Westbrook: $21,000 per student. And they can’t fix ONE curtain?? Where is the money going?”

What it shows: Someone is upset that the curtain is not fixed. The post compares two dollar figures.

What it leaves out: That one figure is a total and the other is per student. It also leaves out Westbrook’s budget year and stage.

Ask: Which number is a total, and which is per student?

Evidence C Repair quote

The facilities quote for a new curtain

Stage curtain replacement, main auditorium: remove the torn curtain, supply and install a flame-retardant replacement. Total: $6,800.

What it shows: Replacing the curtain would cost $6,800. The facilities office has already priced the job for the theater advisor.

What it leaves out: Which budget line would pay for it, and how the district ranks it against other repairs.

Ask: What does the quote confirm, and who received it?

Printable pages by grade band

Each grade band has its own student pages and educator pages for this case. The educator pages show every student page with sample answers. See every printable page for this case, including the course editions.

Real news and research for this case

These news stories and studies are real. Each link opens the original in a new tab.

Real source News NPR April 18, 2016

Why America's Schools Have A Money Problem

Explains how local property taxes make school budgets very different from one district to the next.

Read on npr.org (opens in a new tab)

Real source News Chalkbeat May 28, 2026

A financial reckoning is hitting America’s public schools

Big districts are making cuts, showing how a huge budget can still leave little for extras like a stage curtain.

Read on chalkbeat.org (opens in a new tab)
More news and research (5)

Real source News Chalkbeat September 13, 2023

Schools face a funding cliff. How bad will the fall be?

Temporary federal money ran out, a real example of the gap between budget intent and what classrooms get.

Read on chalkbeat.org (opens in a new tab)

Real source Video Vermont Public October 22, 2024

How does Vermont pay for schools? A video explainer and glossary of terms

A public-media video walking through one state’s school budget process and the terms voters see.

Read on vermontpublic.org (opens in a new tab)

Real source Video Lincoln Institute of Land Policy October 10, 2024

Balancing Act: The Property Tax–School Funding Dilemma

A short film on the trade-off between local control and equity when property taxes fund schools.

Read on lincolninst.edu (opens in a new tab)

Real source Government source National Center for Education Statistics May 2024

Public School Revenue Sources (Condition of Education)

The official breakdown of school money by federal, state and local sources, the first step in following the money.

Read on nces.ed.gov (opens in a new tab)

Real source Research The Quarterly Journal of Economics (Jackson, Johnson & Persico) October 1, 2015

The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms

Major study finding that more per-pupil spending raised graduation and adult earnings, especially for low-income students.

Read on doi.org (opens in a new tab)

Links checked September 24, 2026.

Professional standards

Many professions publish a code of ethics. These parts of real codes apply to this case.

Real source American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) 2013

ASPA Code of Ethics: 5. Fully Inform and Advise.

Provide accurate, honest, comprehensive, and timely information and advice to elected and appointed officials and governing board members

In plain words: ASPA members agree to give decision-makers, such as school board members, accurate and complete information.

Ask: The $6,800 curtain quote went to the theater advisor. What should the board see to rank that repair?

Sample answers
Grades 6–8
The board should see the $6,800 quote, a photo of the torn curtain and the budget line that could pay for it.
Grades 9–10
The board needs the $6,800 quote, the photo and the budget line that would pay for it. Then it can compare the curtain with other repairs.
Grades 11–12
The board needs the $6,800 quote, evidence of the damage and the budget line that would cover it. Then it can rank the curtain against other repairs.
Read the full code on the ASPA website (opens in a new tab)

Real source Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) 2014

SPJ Code of Ethics: Seek Truth and Report It

Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story.

In plain words: Journalists who follow the SPJ code give readers the background they need so a number does not mislead them.

Ask: The post compares a $48 million total with Westbrook's $21,000 per student. What context would a reader need?

Sample answers
Grades 6–8
A reader needs to know that one number is for the whole district and one is for each student.
Grades 9–10
A reader needs both figures per student, from the same year and the same budget stage.
Grades 11–12
A reader needs matching units, the same year and stage, and a note that $15,000 per student still says nothing about need.
Read the full code on the SPJ website (opens in a new tab)

Real source National Communication Association (NCA) 2024

Credo for Ethical Communication: “We advocate truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason…” (one of nine unnumbered principles)

We advocate truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason as essential to the integrity of communication.

In plain words: NCA members treat truth, accuracy and sound reasoning as the base of honest communication.

Ask: The sample correction says $15,000 per student “proves we are underfunded.” What else would you need to know first?

Read the full code on the NCA website (opens in a new tab)
Share, schedule or open in your apps

Reading passage by grade band

Each grade band has its own longer reading passage built from this case’s story and its real sources. Real news, laws and research are cited in the text with their dates. Three “Stop and think” questions sit inside each passage. Open a band to read it, or print that band on its own.

Grades 6–8: $48 million and one torn curtain

469 words

$48 million and one torn curtain

The story: The curtain that won’t close

The curtain in the school theater is torn, and it no longer closes all the way. Dec, 17, pulls that curtain at every show. He and Anika, 16, are on the theater crew. The facilities office has priced a new curtain at $6,800.

Mari, 19, is helping them prepare a question for the school board. They find the district’s proposed budget for next school year. The total is $48 million for a projected 3,200 students. One line sets aside $310,000 for building repairs at all schools.

On Tuesday at 6:10 p.m., a post starts going around. It compares the district’s $48 million with another district, Westbrook, at $21,000 per student. “And they can’t fix ONE curtain??” it asks.

Mari’s first question is simple: where are those numbers from? Your role is to work out the per-student number before anyone repeats the post.

Same scale, fair comparison

In Lesson 11, you learned to compare two things on the same terms. The post does not. It compares a total for a whole district with an amount per student. That is like comparing a whole pizza with one slice.

A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared. Do the math: $48,000,000 divided by 3,200 students is $15,000 per student. Now the two numbers are on the same scale. Even so, the comparison is not complete. Nobody knows Westbrook’s budget year or stage.

An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends. Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants. The budget is marked “proposed.” In Lesson 4, you learned that a proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet. The figures may change before the board adopts the budget.

In Lesson 5, you read a pay statement line by line. A budget works the same way. Mari looks for the line that might pay for a curtain. The building repairs line is one guess. Dec starts with what he can show: the curtain, his photo and the $6,800 quote. “I don’t know where the money went,” he says, “so I’m not guessing.”

In Lesson 4, you also learned that a decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice. Here, the school board adopts the budget. So Dec’s question goes to the board: which line pays for stage equipment, and when does the board hear requests?

A TV show asks the same question

In the first episode of the TV comedy Abbott Elementary (ABC, December 7, 2021), teachers need rugs and supplies. The principal gets money and spends it on a new sign instead. The money existed. The question is which line it was in, and who decided.

Key terms in this passage

Revenue
Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants.
Expenditure
An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends.
Per-pupil amount
A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared.
Proposal
A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
Decision-maker
A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.

Real sources cited

Grades 9–10: A total is not a per-student number

597 words

A total is not a per-student number

The story: A curtain and a viral post

Dec pulls the stage curtain at every show. The fabric is torn, and the curtain no longer closes all the way. Dec, 17, and Anika, 16, are on the theater crew, and the facilities office has already given the theater advisor a quote to replace it: $6,800.

Mari, 19, is helping them prepare a question for the school board. Together they find the district’s proposed budget for next school year. The top line is $48 million for a projected 3,200 students. One line reads “Facilities, building repairs (all schools): $310,000.” A note at the bottom says the figures are proposed and may change before the board adopts the budget.

Then, on Tuesday at 6:10 p.m., a post starts circulating: “Our district: $48 MILLION. Westbrook: $21,000 per student. And they can’t fix ONE curtain?? Where is the money going?” Anika sends it to the chat. Dec admits the curtain part is true. Mari asks where the numbers come from.

Your role is to work out the per-student number before anyone repeats the post.

Year, stage and unit

Before comparing two budget numbers, check three labels: the year, the stage and the unit. The post skips all three. Its $48 million is a proposed total for a whole district next year. Its Westbrook figure is a per-student amount from an unknown year and stage.

A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared. The new skill is comparing numbers on the same scale, and it builds on Lesson 11, where you compared two jobs on the same terms. Divide $48,000,000 by 3,200 students, and the district’s proposed amount is $15,000 per student. The post’s comparison now looks different. It is still incomplete, because Westbrook’s budget year and stage are unknown. A per-pupil figure also cannot say whether either district has enough for its students’ needs.

Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants. An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends. The budget is a plan for expenditures, and it is a proposal, the Lesson 4 term for a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet. A proposed budget, an adopted budget and actual spending are three different documents.

Lesson 5 taught you to read a document line by line. Mari applies that to the budget. She reads the labels before reacting to the big number, and she looks for the line that could cover a curtain. Lesson 13 taught you to keep a claim as small as your evidence. Dec does that. His photo shows the tear, and that is all it shows. He brings the photo, the $6,800 quote and a question.

The Lesson 4 decision-maker, the person or group with the power to make a particular choice, is the school board, which adopts the budget. Dec’s question should name one line, one need and the board’s next chance to hear requests. He also wants to ask it himself, because it is his crew’s curtain.

Real budgets, real limits

The National Center for Education Statistics reports that public schools get revenue from federal, state and local sources, and the mix differs by state (NCES, May 2024). NPR has explained how local property taxes make school budgets very different from one district to the next (NPR, April 18, 2016). Many large districts are now making cuts because of inflation and enrollment declines, which shows how a large budget can leave little room for extras (Chalkbeat, May 28, 2026).

Key terms in this passage

Revenue
Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants.
Expenditure
An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends.
Per-pupil amount
A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared.
Proposal
A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
Decision-maker
A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.

Real sources cited

Grades 11–12: Reading a budget before reacting to it

720 words

Reading a budget before reacting to it

The story: Where is the money going?

Dec, 17, a senior on the theater crew, pulls the stage curtain at every show. It is torn and no longer closes all the way. The facilities office has already priced a flame-retardant replacement, removal and installation included, at $6,800. Dec has a photo of the tear. He wants to take the problem to the school board, and he wants to be the one who asks.

Mari, 19, is helping him and Anika, 16, prepare. The district’s proposed budget for next school year is posted online. The headline figure is $48,000,000, with projected enrollment of 3,200 students. A facilities line provides $310,000 for building repairs across all schools. A note warns that the figures are proposed and may change before adoption.

On Tuesday at 6:10 p.m., a post begins circulating. It sets the district’s $48 million beside Westbrook’s $21,000 per student and asks why the district cannot fix one curtain. The post has the emotional logic of a good question. It also has the arithmetic of a bad one. Mari’s instinct is to ask where the numbers are from.

Your role is to work out the per-student number before anyone repeats the post.

Putting numbers on the same scale

Budget numbers carry three labels that must match before a comparison means anything: year, stage and unit. The post mismatches all three. It pairs a proposed district total for next year with a per-student figure of unknown year and stage.

A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared. The new skill in this case is comparing numbers on the same scale. It extends Lesson 11’s habit of comparing like with like. Dividing $48,000,000 by 3,200 gives $15,000 per student. The recalculation changes the post’s implied story, but it does not settle it. Westbrook’s year and stage are still unknown, and a per-pupil figure cannot show whether either district’s funding matches its students’ needs.

The vocabulary of public finance keeps other distinctions straight. Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants. An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends. This document is a proposal, the Lesson 4 term for a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet. A proposed budget, the adopted budget and actual spending are three different records.

The crew’s method draws on earlier cases. Mari reads the budget line by line, the skill from Lesson 5, looking for the line that could plausibly cover a stage curtain. She is not sure a curtain counts as a building repair, and she wants to find out. Dec follows Lesson 13’s rule of keeping a claim as small as the evidence. His photo proves the tear and nothing about where money went, so he brings the photo, the quote and a question rather than an accusation. Lesson 4’s decision-maker, the person or group with the power to make a particular choice, points to the school board, which adopts the budget within state and federal rules. His question should name one budget line, one need and the board’s next chance to hear requests.

Funding, spending and outcomes

National data give context but not local answers. NCES reports that public-school revenue comes from federal, state and local sources, with a mix that varies by state (NCES, May 2024). Its state-by-state table for 2022–23 includes per-pupil amounts (NCES Digest table 235.20, March 2026). Reliance on local property taxes produces large differences between districts (NPR, April 18, 2016).

Budgets also change over time. When temporary federal pandemic relief ran out, districts faced what reporters called a funding cliff (Chalkbeat, September 13, 2023). In 2026, many districts made cuts and layoffs tied to inflation and enrollment declines (Chalkbeat, May 28, 2026). Spending levels matter for students. A major study of school finance reforms found that more per-pupil spending raised graduation rates and adult earnings, especially for low-income students (Jackson, Johnson and Persico, Quarterly Journal of Economics, October 1, 2015).

The SPJ code offers a rule for anyone writing about budgets: “Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story” (SPJ Code of Ethics, September 6, 2014). The viral post fails that test, and Dec’s question passes it.

Key terms in this passage

Revenue
Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants.
Expenditure
An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends.
Per-pupil amount
A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared.
Proposal
A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
Decision-maker
A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.

Real sources cited

College and community: Budget literacy and the politics of a number

742 words

Budget literacy and the politics of a number

The story: A local need and a viral comparison

A high school’s stage curtain is torn and no longer closes. Dec, 17, pulls it at every performance. Facilities has priced a replacement at $6,800. With Anika, 16, and Mari, 19, Dec plans to raise it with the school board, and he insists on asking in person.

The district’s proposed budget for next year lists $48,000,000 for a projected 3,200 students and $310,000 for building repairs across all schools. It notes that the figures may change before adoption. Then a post circulates on Tuesday evening. It pairs the district’s $48 million with a neighboring district’s $21,000 per student and asks why one curtain cannot be fixed.

The post is persuasive because its underlying grievance is real. The curtain is broken. Its numbers, however, are incommensurable. Mari’s response models budget literacy. She reads the labels before reacting to the magnitude. “Proposed” means next year’s plan, not this year’s spending. The units must be checked. And she asks which line could plausibly fund a curtain at all.

Your role is to work out the per-student number before anyone repeats the post.

Commensurability and the chain of decisions

Comparisons require commensurable figures, meaning the same year, the same stage and the same unit. A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared. The district’s proposed per-pupil figure is $15,000, which is $48,000,000 divided by 3,200. Only after that conversion does a comparison with Westbrook become possible, and it remains incomplete while Westbrook’s year and stage are unknown. Even a perfect comparison would measure resources, not adequacy. A per-pupil figure cannot say whether students’ needs are met.

The case’s vocabulary distinguishes flows from plans. Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants. An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends. The document at hand is a proposal, a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet, in Lesson 4’s terms. It is distinct from the adopted budget and from actual spending.

The case also completes a sequence of numerical skills. Lesson 5 introduced line-by-line reading of a financial document. Lesson 11 required comparing situations on the same terms. Lesson 13 required keeping a claim as small as the evidence. Here, Mari applies the first two to the budget, and Dec applies the third to his own evidence. His photo establishes the tear. It says nothing about where funds went, so he declines to speculate.

Lesson 4’s decision-maker, the person or group with the power to make a particular choice, locates authority. The school board adopts the budget within state and federal rules, so it, not the principal, is the right audience. An effective question names a line, a need and a procedural moment: which line covers stage equipment, what the $6,800 request would require and when the board hears requests before adoption.

Finance, evidence and professional duty

School revenue combines federal, state and local sources in proportions that vary by state (NCES, May 2024). NCES publishes state-by-state revenue with per-pupil amounts for 2022–23 (NCES Digest table 235.20, March 2026). Those figures give context and cannot stand in for a district’s own adopted budget. Local property-tax reliance produces large disparities (NPR, April 18, 2016). The trade-off between local control and equity is itself a policy debate (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, October 10, 2024).

Budgets also change with circumstances. The expiration of federal pandemic relief created a funding cliff for many districts (Chalkbeat, September 13, 2023). By 2026, many districts were cutting programs and staff because of inflation and falling enrollment (Chalkbeat, May 28, 2026). The stakes are measurable. Jackson, Johnson and Persico found that increases in per-pupil spending from school finance reforms raised educational attainment and adult earnings, particularly for low-income students (Quarterly Journal of Economics, October 1, 2015).

Professional codes apply to both sides of Dec’s question. ASPA asks public administrators to give governing boards “accurate, honest, comprehensive, and timely information and advice” (ASPA Code of Ethics, 2013). The NCA credo holds “truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason” to be “essential to the integrity of communication” (NCA Credo for Ethical Communication, 2024). The TV connection adds a cultural lens. In Abbott Elementary’s pilot, a principal spends money on a sign while teachers need supplies (ABC, December 7, 2021). A TV show cannot settle a real budget, but its question is the case’s question: which line, and who decided?

Key terms in this passage

Revenue
Revenue is money that comes into a government or an organization, such as taxes and grants.
Expenditure
An expenditure is money that a government or an organization spends.
Per-pupil amount
A per-pupil amount is a total divided by the number of students, so that districts of different sizes can be compared.
Proposal
A proposal is a change that someone suggests and that has not been approved yet.
Decision-maker
A decision-maker is the person or group with the power to make a particular choice.

Real sources cited

Pacing options

10-minute bellringer

10 minutes

One piece of evidence and one question. Use it to open the case or to review it the next day.

Go to the bellringer

One class period

45 minutes

Teach the lesson steps on this page in four parts.

Go to the lesson steps

The student edition also has a one-period plan for each grade band:

  • Grades 6–8: 45 minutes
  • Grades 9–10: 50 minutes
  • Grades 11–12: 60 minutes
  • College and community: 75 minutes

Full chapter

79 to 106 minutes

Teach every page of the student edition chapter. The educator edition has notes and sample answers beside each page.

  • Grades 6–8: 79 minutes
  • Grades 9–10: 84 minutes
  • Grades 11–12: 105 minutes
  • College and community: 106 minutes

Find the printable pages

Minutes for each page

How long each student edition page takes, and what to cut when you have one class period.

Open your grade band.

Grades 6–8: full chapter 79 minutes, one period 45 minutes
PageFull chapterOne periodHow to cut
Opener6 min4 minRead What happened aloud while students follow along.
Key terms6 min3 minRead the key terms aloud. Skip Who is involved.
Look at the evidence12 min10 minRead the budget note aloud. Students fill in only the What it shows boxes.
Key idea8 min3 minRead the first paragraph of the key idea aloud. Skip the code of ethics.
Sort the evidence8 minSkipSkip this page.
Practice8 min5 minVote on the three options and skip the marked draft.
Your task18 min16 minFill in the source card together, then students write the question.
Check your work5 minSkipSkip this page. Check the questions with the success list yourself.
Questions to discuss8 min4 minUse question 2 as an exit ticket.
Talk about this case at homeAt homeAt home
Grades 9–10: full chapter 84 minutes, one period 50 minutes
PageFull chapterOne periodHow to cut
Opener5 min4 minRead What happened aloud and go straight to the evidence.
Key terms5 minSkipSkip this page. Define per-pupil amount aloud in one minute.
Look at the evidence8 min7 minStudents fill in only the What it shows boxes for Evidence A and B.
Look at the evidence, continued4 min3 minRead Evidence C aloud. Students fill in only its What it shows box.
Key idea10 min8 minSkip the code of ethics. Work the division together.
Sort the evidence6 minSkipSkip this page.
Practice8 min6 minVote on the three options and fix only the first marked phrase.
Your task20 min18 minFill in the calculation box together, then students write the post.
Check your work8 minSkipCollect the posts and score them with the rubric yourself.
Questions to discuss10 min4 minUse question 3 as an exit ticket.
Talk about this case at homeAt homeAt home
Grades 11–12: full chapter 105 minutes, one period 60 minutes
PageFull chapterOne periodHow to cut
Opener4 min3 minRead What happened aloud and go straight to the evidence.
Key terms4 minSkipSkip this page.
Look at the evidence8 min6 minStudents fill in only the What it leaves out boxes.
Look at the evidence, continued4 min3 minRead Evidence C aloud. Students fill in only its What it leaves out box.
Key idea12 min10 minSkip the In the news section.
Sort the evidence8 min4 minComplete the chain together on the board.
Practice5 minSkipSkip this page.
Your task12 min10 minWrite the equity and adequacy box together.
Your draft30 min22 minStudents draft the two sections in class and finish the brief at home.
Check your work8 minSkipCollect the briefs and score them with the rubric yourself.
Questions to discuss10 min2 minAsk question 1 aloud as an exit ticket.
Talk about this case at homeAt homeAt home
College and community: full chapter 106 minutes, one period 75 minutes
PageFull chapterOne periodHow to cut
Opener4 min3 minRead What happened aloud and go straight to the key terms.
Key terms4 min2 minRead the key terms aloud. Skip Who is involved.
Look at the evidence8 min7 minParticipants fill in only the What it leaves out boxes.
Look at the evidence, continued5 min4 minRead Evidence C aloud. Participants fill in only its What it shows box.
Key idea12 min10 minSkip the In the news section.
Sort the evidence8 minSkipSkip this page.
Practice5 min5 min
Your task12 min12 min
Your draft30 min26 minParticipants draft the two sections in the session and finish afterward.
Check your work8 min3 minParticipants answer the Check your work questions only.
Questions to discuss10 min3 minUse question 3 as a closing question.
Talk about this case at homeAt homeAt home

Minutes for each page are in the educator edition for each grade band.

10-minute bellringer

  1. 1 min Project Evidence A as students come in.
  2. 5 min Students read it on their own. Each student writes a one-sentence answer to the question.
  3. 4 min Take two or three answers. Then ask the follow-up questions.

Evidence A Budget excerpt

The proposed budget for next school year

PROPOSED BUDGET, NEXT SCHOOL YEAR. Total proposed budget: $48,000,000. Projected enrollment: 3,200 students. Facilities, building repairs (all schools): $310,000. Note: figures are proposed and may change before the board adopts the budget.

Question Is this what the district spent, or what it plans to spend?

Follow-up questions

  1. How much is proposed for building repairs at all schools?
  2. What would you need to know to find out whether the stage curtain will be fixed?

Listen for: Students read “proposed” and “may change before the board adopts the budget” and find the $310,000 repair line.

This is the same bellringer as on the bellringers page, which has one for every case.

Lesson steps

This plan takes 45 minutes in four parts. Each step says what you do, what students do and how to check.

Warm-up 5 minutes

  1. 1 The curtain 5 min

    You
    Show Mateo’s photo of the curtain (with permission) and the district’s total budget.
    Students
    Write the question the photo raises and the question the total raises.
    Check
    Students notice the two questions aren’t the same.

Read and discuss 28 minutes

  1. 2 Label the number 10 min

    You
    Hand out the budget excerpt. Teach year, stage and units.
    Students
    Label the excerpt: which year, proposed or adopted, total or per pupil?
    Check
    Labels identify “proposed, next year, total.”
  2. 3 Fix the comparison 10 min

    You
    Show the social post comparing a total with a per-pupil figure.
    Students
    Explain the mismatch and what you’d need to compare fairly.
    Check
    Students name matching units, year and category.
  3. 4 Who decides? 8 min

    You
    Map federal, state and local roles; explain equity vs. adequacy.
    Students
    Place the curtain request on the map: which level, which line, which body?
    Check
    Map points to the local board and a facilities line.

Questions for the people in the case

  1. Mari: What would you check on the budget first? Check next: Read the document labels and notes before interpreting a number.
  2. Mari: What makes the question concrete? Check next: Find the current local document and responsible decision-making body.
  3. Dec: Can a photo make the case? Check next: Keep what you observed separate from why you think it happened.
  4. Dec: Who would you actually ask? Check next: Find which body adopts the budget, which line could apply and when it considers requests.

Task 9 minutes

  1. 5 Write the question 9 min

    You
    Model a one-line budget question.
    Students
    Draft a question and a 60-second comment for the board.
    Check
    Question names a line, a need and a request.

Wrap-up 3 minutes

  1. 6 Exit 3 min

    You
    Ask: what could make spending rise without improving a service?
    Students
    Write one possibility.
    Check
    Answers include cost increases or different categories.

Educator notes by page

These notes follow the pages of the student edition chapter. The educator edition prints the same notes beside each page. Heat check tells you how likely a page is to bring up strong feelings: low, medium or high. Medium and high pages come with a cool-down. Open a page to see what to say, what to watch for and how to support students.

Opener

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “$48 million, and the curtain still won’t close. What is your first reaction?” Collect reactions. Then ask what kind of number $48 million is.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students assume a large total means money is free for any need.
Listen for:
“They have millions, they’re just wasting it.”
Then:
Ask what the $48 million has to cover. Write “whole district, next year” on the board.

Support

  • Read What happened aloud. List the three dollar amounts on the board with their labels.

Key terms

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Has any of the $48 million been spent yet?” No. It is a proposed plan. Planned expenditures are not money already spent.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students treat revenue and expenditure as the same.
Listen for:
“Revenue is what they spend.”
Then:
Revenue comes in and an expenditure goes out. Draw two arrows on the board.

Support

  • Pair students who share a language to explain each term with a number from the case.

Look at the evidence

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Before you react to any number, find its year, its stage and its unit.” Model it on the $48 million: next year, proposed, whole district.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students read the proposed budget as money already spent.
Listen for:
“They spent $48 million and didn’t fix it.”
Then:
Point to “PROPOSED” and “NEXT SCHOOL YEAR.” Nothing here has been spent.

Support

  • Give students a calculator and the budget excerpt with its labels highlighted.
  • Read the budget note aloud.

Stretch

Ask why the $310,000 line cannot show whether the curtain is funded, even though it is the right kind of line.

Key idea

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Divide $48,000,000 by 3,200 students. Compare it with $21,000. Is the comparison fair yet?” Not yet. Westbrook’s year and stage are unknown.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students treat the ASPA code as a law for school boards.
Listen for:
“The board is breaking the ASPA code.”
Then:
Say: “ASPA’s code is for its members in public service. It is not a law.”

Support

  • Work the division on the board. Label the answer $15,000 per student, proposed.

Stretch

Use the SPJ row: what context would a news story need before comparing the two districts?

Sort the evidence

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Trace the curtain request. Who ranks it, who adopts the budget and where can students speak?” Model the first box: the facilities office.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students name the principal as the decider.
Listen for:
“Just ask the principal to buy it.”
Then:
Point to the chain: the elected school board adopts the budget.

Support

  • Let students write the name of each office before writing sentences.

Practice

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Someone reposts the comparison with ‘we get way less.’ What do you do first?” Hold a quick vote before any discussion.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students pick C because the math is right.
Listen for:
“$15,000 is less, so we’re underfunded.”
Then:
Ask what one per-student figure can prove. It cannot show need.

Support

  • Read the three options aloud before students choose.

Your task and draft

4 grade bands

The task is different in each grade band. Open yours.

Grades 6–8

Your task

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “A good board question names one line and one need.” Write “one line, one need, one question” on the board.

Watch for

Misconception:
Questions accuse the board.
Listen for:
“Why are you wasting our money?”
Then:
Ask what the board could answer. Turn it into a which or when question.
Grades 9–10

Your task

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “What unit is each number in? Say it out loud before you divide.” A district total, and dollars per student.

Watch for

Misconception:
The correction concludes the district is underfunded.
Listen for:
“$15,000 is less, so we’re shortchanged.”
Then:
Ask what else differs between districts: costs, needs and categories.
Grades 11–12

Your task

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Equity asks if the share is fair. Adequacy asks if there is enough. Which one is the curtain question?” Accept either, with a reason.

Watch for

Misconception:
Students treat equity and adequacy as the same claim.
Listen for:
“If it’s fair, there’s enough.”
Then:
Ask: could every school get a fair share and the curtain still stay torn?

Your draft

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Name one request that loses under your criteria. Say it in the brief.” Partners check for that sentence.

Watch for

Misconception:
Criteria are vague.
Listen for:
“Fix what matters most first.”
Then:
Ask how the board would measure “matters most.” Each criterion needs a test.
College and community

Your task

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “A fact-check starts with the claim in the poster’s words. What exactly does the post say?” Copy the post’s figures onto the board with their units.

Watch for

Misconception:
Participants call the post false.
Listen for:
“The post is fake.”
Then:
Ask which part is wrong. The figures may be real; the comparison is mismatched.

Your draft

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Could a reader check each of your numbers? Name the document for each one.” Partners circle any number without a source.

Watch for

Misconception:
The fact-check claims the district is underfunded.
Listen for:
“So we get less than Westbrook.”
Then:
Ask what the post leaves out about Westbrook’s figure.

Check your work

Heat check: Low

Say this

  • “Find the sentence in your question that names one budget line and one need.” Circulate and ask for the label “proposed” if it is missing.

Watch for

Misconception:
Revisions only soften the tone.
Listen for:
“I took out the rude part.”
Then:
Point to the Revision row. Ask for an added label or a specific budget line.

Questions to discuss

Say this

  • “Answer with a label or a number from the evidence.” Ask for one answer per question.

Stretch

With an adult, find your district’s budget, label its year and stage and find one line for a space you use.

Talk about this case at home

Say this

  • “Read this page at home with someone you trust.” Nobody needs to share family money information to complete it.

Sample response

Worked example, grades 9–10

Prompt: Correct a misleading social post that compares mismatched budget figures, then write a better comparison with a worked calculation.

Student response

Correction: A post going around says our district has $48 million and Westbrook spends $21,000 per student, so we’re being shortchanged. 1 Those numbers can’t be compared. The $48 million is our district’s total proposed budget for next year, and the Westbrook number is per student. To compare fairly, divide our total by our projected enrollment: 2$48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students = $15,000 per student. So our district spends less per student, 3 which proves we are underfunded. 4 We also need to check that both numbers are for the same year and the same stage, proposed or adopted. Source: district proposed budget, next school year.

  1. Strength. Clear diagnosis stated up front, before any math.
  2. Evidence. Correct calculation that turns the total into a comparable unit, with the work shown.
  3. Revise. Per-pupil figures cannot settle adequacy on their own. Costs, student needs and budget categories differ between districts, and a proposed budget is not spending.
  4. Strength. Strong: the writer names the remaining conditions for a fair comparison.

Before: So our district spends less per student, which proves we are underfunded.

After: So our district’s proposed budget works out to less per student than Westbrook’s figure, but that alone can’t tell us whether either district has enough for its students’ needs.

Why: The revision keeps the useful comparison while separating what the numbers show from a conclusion about adequacy they cannot support.

Educator commentary: The correction diagnoses the unit mismatch immediately and shows a correct per-pupil calculation, which is the core of the task. It then overreaches, treating one comparison as proof of underfunding and calling a proposed budget spending. Qualifying the conclusion moves it from Developing to Proficient on Reasoning, and noting that Westbrook’s year and stage are unknown would reach Advanced.

Task answers by grade band

What a strong student in each grade band writes in the student edition task.

Open your grade band.

Grades 6–8

Make a source card for the district budget and write one question the theater crew could bring to the school board.

Students make: Source card plus a 2–3 sentence question.

Steps students follow

  1. Read the top of the budget in Evidence A. Write its year and stage on the source card.
  2. Check the units. Write whether $48 million is a total or a per-student number.
  3. Find the line that might pay for repairs. Copy it onto the card.
  4. Write a question of 2 or 3 sentences in the Your draft box.
  5. Name the curtain, the $6,800 quote and the budget line in your question.
  6. Read your question aloud and check that it blames no one.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Year
Next school year
Stage
Proposed
Units
Total for the district
The line that might pay for the curtain
Building repairs, all schools: $310,000

Sample draft: Your draft

Sample answer Grades 6–8

1 The proposed budget for next year sets aside $310,000 for building repairs at all schools. We noticed the theater curtain is torn and does not close all the way, and 2 a new one costs $6,800. 3 Could the board explain which budget line pays for stage repairs?

  1. Labels the stage and the year.
  2. Brings the repair quote as evidence.
  3. Asks a question the board can answer, without blaming anyone.

Check your work questions

  1. Does your question say the budget is proposed and for next year?
  2. Does it name the curtain and the $6,800 quote?
  3. Does it name one budget line?
  4. Does it ask without blaming anyone?
One change I made
I took out my guess about wasted money, because we don’t know where the money went.

My take: sample answers

I think Dec should ask ___ because ___.
I think Dec should ask which line pays for the curtain because the total does not say.
The evidence that changed my first guess is ___.
The evidence that changed my first guess is the word “proposed” on the budget.
One question I still have is ___.
One question I still have is who decides which repairs come first.
Grades 9–10

Correct a misleading social post that compares mismatched budget figures, then write a better comparison.

Students make: Correction post (80–120 words) plus worked calculation.

Steps students follow

  1. Read the post in Evidence B. Underline the total and the per-student figure.
  2. Calculate $48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students in the calculation box.
  3. List what you still cannot compare: year, stage and categories.
  4. Write a correction post of 80 to 120 words in the Your draft box.
  5. Cite the proposed budget and its year in your post.
  6. Finish with one question the numbers cannot answer.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Worked calculation
$48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students = $15,000 per student
The mismatch in the post
The post compares a district total with another district’s per-student figure.
What still does not match
Westbrook’s budget year and stage, and whether both figures count the same costs.

Sample draft: Your correction post, 80 to 120 words

Sample answer Grades 9–10

Correction: a post going around compares our district’s $48 million with Westbrook’s $21,000 per student. 1 Those numbers use different units. The $48 million is our district’s total proposed budget for next school year. To compare fairly, divide it by projected enrollment: 2$48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students = $15,000 per student. That is less than Westbrook’s figure, but 3 we don’t know Westbrook’s year or stage. 4 A per-student number also can’t tell us whether either district has enough for its students’ needs. Source: our district’s proposed budget, next school year.

  1. Names the mismatch before any math.
  2. Shows the calculation, so readers can check it.
  3. States what still does not match.
  4. Keeps the conclusion within what the numbers show.

Check your work questions

  1. Does your post name the unit mismatch?
  2. Is your calculation correct and shown?
  3. Do you cite the source and its year?
  4. Do you say what the numbers still can’t show?
One change I made after feedback
I changed “which proves we are underfunded” to what the numbers can’t show, because one figure cannot prove that.

My take: sample answers

My claim: ___.
Dec should ask which line covers stage equipment and bring the $6,800 quote.
The best evidence is ___, because ___.
The budget excerpt, because it shows $310,000 for repairs at all schools.
Someone who disagrees might say ___.
The district must have money for a curtain, because the total is $48 million.
I would change my mind if ___.
The board showed that the curtain is already funded.
Grades 11–12

Write a policy brief on how facilities requests should be prioritized in a district budget.

Students make: Policy brief, 450–550 words.

Steps students follow

  1. Reread Evidence A and C. Note the $310,000 line and the $6,800 quote.
  2. Write one sentence each defining equity and adequacy for facilities.
  3. Draft three criteria for ranking repair requests.
  4. Test your criteria on the curtain request. Record where it would rank.
  5. Draft the criteria and trade-offs sections on the Your draft page.
  6. Finish the brief, 450 to 550 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
  7. Name one request that would lose under your criteria.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Equity and adequacy
Equity asks whether repair money is fairly shared given different needs. Adequacy asks whether there is enough to meet them.
Three criteria for ranking requests
1. Safety risk. 2. How many students use the space. 3. Cost compared with what is left in the repair line.
The curtain request under my criteria
Safety risk unknown. Used at every show. $6,800 from a $310,000 line for all schools. It ranks in the middle.

Sample draft: Criteria section

Sample answer Grades 11–12

The district’s proposed budget sets $310,000 for building repairs across all schools. That line must cover many requests, so the board needs clear criteria for ranking them. 1 I propose three. First, safety: repairs that protect people come first. Second, use: spaces that many students use every week rank higher. Third, cost: a request’s price is weighed against what remains in the line. 2 Under these criteria, the $6,800 curtain is a middle-ranked request. The auditorium is used at every show, but no document shows a safety risk.

  1. States clear criteria.
  2. Tests the criteria on the case.

Sample draft: Trade-offs section

Sample answer Grades 11–12

These criteria serve equity, because they direct money by need rather than by who asks loudest. 1 They do not settle adequacy. If $310,000 cannot cover every urgent repair, ranking only decides who waits. 2 The trade-off is real. Arts spaces with no safety risk may wait behind other repairs year after year. The board should publish the ranking each year, so students and staff can see where a request stands. State and federal rules limit the budget, but 3 the local board adopts it, so the ranking is a local decision.

  1. Uses equity and adequacy correctly.
  2. Names who loses under the criteria.
  3. Explains state, federal and local roles accurately.

Check your work questions

  1. Does your brief explain federal, state and local roles accurately?
  2. Does it use equity and adequacy correctly?
  3. Does it propose clear criteria and test them on the curtain?
  4. Does it name a trade-off of your own criteria?
One change I made after feedback
I added a request that loses under my criteria, because my first draft made the ranking sound free.

My take: sample answers

My claim: ___.
Dec should ask which line covers stage equipment, how repairs are ranked and when the board hears requests.
The best evidence is ___, because ___.
The budget excerpt, because its labels show a proposed plan, not spending.
Someone who disagrees might say ___.
The $48 million total proves there is money for a $6,800 curtain.
The limit of the evidence is ___.
No document shows how the district ranks repair requests.
I would change my mind if ___.
The board showed that the curtain is already scheduled for repair.
College and community

Write a fact-check of the viral post for a local news site or a campus newspaper. Correct the comparison, show the math and say what the proposed budget can and cannot tell readers about the curtain.

Students make: Fact-check, 350–450 words, with a worked calculation.

Steps students follow

  1. Label each figure in Evidence A and B with its year, stage and units.
  2. Calculate $48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students and label the result.
  3. Note what the post leaves out about Westbrook’s $21,000.
  4. Draft the claim and the unknowns sections on the Your draft page.
  5. Finish the fact-check, 350 to 450 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
  6. Finish with one question readers can bring to the school board.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Labels for each figure
$48,000,000: proposed total, next school year. $21,000: per student, year and stage not given.
My calculation
$48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 = $15,000 per student
Equity and adequacy, in two sentences
Equity asks whether money is shared fairly given different needs. Adequacy asks whether there is enough, which is closer to the curtain question.

Sample draft: The claim and what the documents show

Sample answer College and community

The claim: a post going around says the district has “$48 MILLION” but cannot fix one theater curtain. It compares that total with Westbrook’s $21,000 per student. What the documents show: the $48 million is a proposed total for next school year, for the whole district. 1 It is not money already spent. Divided by 3,200 projected students, it equals $15,000 per student, 2 a proposed figure. 3 The post gives no year or stage for Westbrook’s $21,000, so the two figures still cannot be compared fairly.

  1. Labels the figure’s stage.
  2. Labels the per-student result correctly.
  3. Notes what the comparison still lacks.

Sample draft: What is unknown and where to ask

Sample answer College and community

What is still unknown: the proposed budget sets $310,000 for building repairs at all schools. 1 It does not say whether a stage curtain counts as a building repair. The facilities office priced a replacement at $6,800 for the theater advisor. Nothing in the budget shows how that request ranks against other repairs. NCES reports that revenue sources differ by state, so national data cannot answer a local question. Where to ask: which budget line covers stage equipment, and 2 when will the board hear requests before it adopts the budget?

  1. Explains what the $310,000 line cannot show.
  2. Ends with a question for the school board.

Check your work questions

  1. Is your calculation correct and labeled as proposed?
  2. Do you note that the post gives no year or stage for Westbrook?
  3. Do you explain what the $310,000 line cannot show?
  4. Do you end with a question for the school board?
One change I made after feedback
I labeled $15,000 as proposed, because my draft called it what the district spends.

My take: sample answers

My claim: ___.
Dec should bring the quote, the photo and one question about the repair line to the board.
The best evidence is ___, because ___.
The repair quote, because it turns a complaint into a priced need.
Someone who disagrees might say ___.
The big total means the district is choosing not to fix the curtain.
The limit of the evidence is ___.
The evidence does not show who ranks repair requests or how.
I would change my mind if ___.
The facilities office showed that other repairs rank ahead of the curtain for a clear reason.

Sample task answers for each grade band are in the educator edition for that band.

Evidence answers

Sample answers for the two boxes under each document in the student edition. Grades 6–8 students write one question they still have instead of what the document leaves out.

Evidence A The proposed budget for next school year

Look closely: Circle the year, the stage and the unit for each number.

Grade bandWhat it showsWhat it leaves out
Grades 6–8It is a plan for next year: $48 million for 3,200 students.One question: Does the $310,000 for repairs cover a stage curtain?
Grades 9–10A proposed total of $48 million for 3,200 students, and $310,000 for all repairs.What the district spent this year, and whether a curtain counts as a building repair.
Grades 11–12A proposed plan, not spending: $48 million total and $310,000 for repairs at all schools.Last year’s actual spending, how repairs are ranked and what the board will adopt.
College and communityNext year’s proposed total and repair line, with a note that figures may change.Actual spending, the ranking of repairs and whether stage equipment is in this line.

Evidence B A post shared Tuesday at 6:10 p.m.

Look closely: Which number is a total, and which is per student?

Grade bandWhat it showsWhat it leaves out
Grades 9–10Someone is upset about the curtain and compares two dollar figures.That one figure is a total and one is per student, plus Westbrook’s year and stage.
Grades 11–12A comparison of a district total with another district’s per-student figure.Matching units, Westbrook’s budget year and stage, and any source for its figure.
College and communityAn angry comparison that mixes a total with a per-student figure.A source for Westbrook’s $21,000, its year and stage, and any measure of need.

Evidence C The facilities quote for a new curtain

Look closely: What does the quote confirm, and who received it?

Grade bandWhat it showsWhat it leaves out
Grades 6–8A new curtain would cost $6,800.One question: Which budget line would pay for it?
Grades 9–10Replacing the curtain would cost $6,800. The facilities office priced it.Which budget line pays for it, and how it ranks against other repairs.
Grades 11–12A priced need: $6,800 for a flame-retardant replacement, sent to the advisor.Whether the request reached the board, and where it ranks among other repairs.
College and communityThe need has a price, $6,800, from the district’s own facilities office.Whether the board has seen the request, and which line and ranking apply.

Practice answers

The feedback students see for each choice on the student page.

A post compares the district’s $48 million total with Westbrook’s $21,000 per student. Someone reposts it and adds “we get way less.” What should the crew do first?

  1. Share it. Both figures are in dollars, and the curtain really is torn.

    The curtain is torn, but the two figures use different units. A total for a whole district cannot be compared directly with an amount per student.

  2. Check that both figures use the same year, budget stage and units before comparing them. Best answer

    This makes a fair comparison possible. It also shows whether each figure is a plan or money that was already spent.

  3. Divide $48 million by 3,200 students, and post that the district is underfunded.

    Dividing gives $15,000 per student, so the units now match. But one per-student figure cannot show whether a district has enough, and Westbrook’s year and stage are unknown.

Why the best answer is best, by grade band

Grades 6–8
B. One number is a total and one is per student. You have to check the year, the stage and the units before you compare them.
Grades 9–10
B. A total and a per-student amount cannot be compared directly. C fixes the units but still overclaims, because one figure cannot show underfunding.
Grades 11–12
B. A repeats a unit mismatch. C corrects the units but jumps to underfunding, and Westbrook’s year and stage are unknown. B makes a fair comparison possible.
College and community
B. It checks year, stage and units first. C gets the math right, $15,000 per student, but no single figure shows whether a district has enough.

Whose perspective is missing?

Prompt: Whose view is missing from these documents? What would you ask them?

Grades 6–8
The school board’s view is missing. I would ask which line pays for stage repairs.
Grades 9–10
The facilities office is missing. I would ask how it ranks repair requests and where the curtain is on the list.
Grades 11–12
The board and the facilities office are missing. I would ask whether stage equipment counts as a building repair and when requests are heard.
College and community
Other people who use the auditorium are missing. I would ask how the torn curtain affects their events before the crew speaks for them.

Discussion answers

The numbers match the questions to discuss on the student page. Each sample answer is what a strong student in that grade band might say.

1

What could make spending rise without the service getting better?

Heat check: Low
Grades 9–10
Prices could go up, so the district pays more for the same repairs. More money would not mean better service.
Grades 11–12
Rising costs, such as higher prices for the same work, or more students to serve. Spending can grow while each student gets the same or less.
College and community
Higher prices for the same work, or new costs the district must cover. Spending can rise while the curtain stays torn.
2

Dec wants to ask the board himself. Why might it matter who brings the question?

Heat check: Low
Grades 6–8
Dec pulls the curtain every show. He can say what is wrong because he sees it himself.
Grades 9–10
Dec uses the curtain at every show, so he can speak to what he has seen. The board hears from a student who is affected.
Grades 11–12
A student who uses the curtain brings firsthand evidence and shows the board who is affected. It also gives students practice in a process that affects them.
College and community
Firsthand users carry credibility and show who is affected. Students also learn how to join decisions about spaces they use.
3

What else would you want to know before saying one district gets less than another?

Heat check: Medium

Why: Students may compare wealthy and poor districts they know, or talk about family income. Cool-down: Keep it to the two figures in the case. Ask what we would need to check, and list year, stage, units and need.

Grades 6–8
I would want both numbers per student, from the same year.
Grades 9–10
Westbrook’s budget year and stage, and whether both figures count the same costs.
Grades 11–12
Westbrook’s year, stage and categories, and what each district’s students need. A per-student figure alone cannot show need.
College and community
Matching year, stage and categories, and each district’s costs and student needs. Per-pupil figures cannot settle adequacy.

Sample explanation

One way a student could explain the case in plain words:

Before we compare those numbers, are they from the same year, using the same units and describing the same thing?

En español: Antes de comparar esas cifras, ¿son del mismo año, usan las mismas unidades y describen lo mismo?

Annotated student draft

Prompt: Write the question the theater crew should bring to the school board.

First draft

Our district has a 1$48 million budget but our theater curtain is 5 ripped and gross. That’s so much money and 2 they can’t even fix one curtain? It has been like this since before any of us joined the crew and it keeps getting worse every show. Where is all the money going? 3 Other districts get way more. I saw a post that said so. We deserve better and 4 the board needs to explain themselves. We are honestly tired of waiting for this.

  1. Evidence. Is this proposed or adopted, and for which year? Label it.
  2. Revise. The total covers everything. Name the line that should cover repairs.
  3. Revise. Compared how? Totals, per pupil, same year? Show the matching figures.
  4. Audience. Turn this into a specific question they can answer.
  5. Strength. A real observation. Add the evidence: the photo and a repair quote.

Revised draft

Our question is about next year’s proposed budget. The theater curtain is torn at the seam and no longer closes fully; we have a photo and a $6,800 replacement quote from the facilities office. The proposed budget lists $310,000 for building repairs across the district. We’d like to know whether stage equipment is covered by that line or a different one, how repair requests are ranked, and when the board considers them. Could a student from the theater crew submit a written request before the budget is adopted? Thank you for considering it.

Rubric

Score each row. Proficient is the target for most students.

CriterionBeginningDevelopingProficientAdvanced
EvidenceUses an unlabeled total.Uses a figure without year or stage.Labels year, stage and line and cites the need.Adds a repair quote and notes what the figures can’t show.
ReasoningAssumes waste or theft.Compares mismatched numbers.Links the need to a specific budget line.Explains process questions: ranking, timing, decision-maker.
Audience & purposeAccuses the board.Complains without a request.Asks a question the board can answer.Asks a question and offers a concrete way for students to contribute.
RevisionNo change.Removes insults only.Adds labels and a specific line.Explains how each change makes an answer more likely.

Support and challenge

Support

  • Provide a pre-labeled budget excerpt with one line highlighted
  • Use a calculator and a worked per-pupil example
  • Spanish vocabulary: presupuesto, ingresos, gasto, por estudiante
  • Read the budget notes aloud
  • Reduce to the source-card task

Supports written for each grade band:

Grades 6–8

  • Source-card template: year, stage, units, line
  • Frames: “The budget says __. We noticed __. Could the board explain __?”
  • Vocabulary: revenue, expenditure, per pupil
  • Worked example

Grades 9–10

  • Comparison checklist: year, units, category, stage
  • Model correction

Grades 11–12

  • Brief template
  • Equity vs. adequacy explainer

College and community

  • Label card: year, stage and units for each figure
  • Worked division: $48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 students
  • Fact-check structure: the claim, what the documents show, what is still unknown, where to ask

Challenge

  • Find your own district’s adopted budget and locate the facilities or capital line
  • Compare two years of the same line and explain what might explain a change
Grades 6–8
Explain why the district total alone can’t tell you whether there’s money for the curtain.
Grades 9–10
Calculate a per-pupil figure from a total and enrollment to make a fair comparison.
Grades 11–12
Distinguish equity from adequacy and recommend criteria for choosing among repair requests.
College and community
Explain the difference between equity and adequacy in two sentences, and say which one the curtain question is about.

More extension prompts

These activities are not on the student page. Use them for students who finish early or want a different angle.

Trace it to the source Journalism
Show the source, period, units and calculation. Label any invented figures.
Check the rules Law
Which authority approves the real budget, and what adopted record would you need to check?
Reflect on your thinking Learning
Revise your first conclusion after changing the denominator or adding relevant context.

Try it at your school

Find one line in your school’s budget.

  1. With a teacher or advisor, find your district’s budget on its website
  2. Label the document’s year and stage
  3. Find one line connected to something you use (facilities, arts, technology)
  4. Ask your student council how students can submit a budget question or comment

Who to ask Student council advisor, school business office, school board clerk, principal

Stay safe Get permission before photographing spaces or people at school. Stick to observed facts when posting about budgets.

Classroom resources

Free outside resources we checked for this case. Watch, Try and Read items work for students. Teach items are for you and stay off the student pages. Preview a link before you use it with a class.

Try

Games, simulations and tools students use themselves.

Students and educators U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

CPI Inflation Calculator

Convert an old budget figure into today’s dollars so two years compare on the same scale.

  • Grades 6–8
  • Grades 9–12
  • Ages 16–24

U.S. government work; public domain.

Also on the student page, under Explore more.

Open on bls.gov (opens in a new tab)

Read

Articles, official pages and case records.

Students and educators National Center for Education Statistics

Search for Public School Districts

Look up your district’s revenue and spending per student in its fiscal data.

  • Grades 9–12
  • Ages 16–24

U.S. government work; public domain.

Also on the student page, under Explore more.

Open on nces.ed.gov (opens in a new tab)

Students and educators USAFacts

How are public schools in the US funded?

See federal, state and local shares of school money with charts built from government data.

  • Grades 6–8
  • Grades 9–12
  • Ages 16–24

Also on the student page, under Explore more.

Open on usafacts.org (opens in a new tab)

Students and educators Peter G. Peterson Foundation

How Is K-12 Education Funded?

A short explainer with charts on where school money comes from and how it is spent.

  • Grades 9–12
  • Ages 16–24

Also on the student page, under Explore more.

Open on pgpf.org (opens in a new tab)

Links checked September 25, 2026.

Standards

Common Core codes come from our standards map for this case. Each code links to the official standard. The C3 row names what students do for each code. The College and community row names the AAC&U VALUE rubrics and ACRL Framework frames the task practices. AAC&U says VALUE rubrics are for reviewing learning across a college, not for grading, so score the task with the case rubric.

GradeWhat students doStandards
Grade 6

Make a source card for the district budget and write one question the theater crew could bring to the school board.

Students make: Source card plus a 2–3 sentence question.

RI.6.1 (opens in a new tab) W.6.2 (opens in a new tab) W.6.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.6.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.6.1.d (opens in a new tab)
Grade 7RI.7.1 (opens in a new tab) W.7.2 (opens in a new tab) W.7.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.7.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.7.1.d (opens in a new tab)
Grade 8RI.8.1 (opens in a new tab) W.8.2 (opens in a new tab) W.8.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.8.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.8.1.d (opens in a new tab)
Grades 9–10

Correct a misleading social post that compares mismatched budget figures, then write a better comparison.

Students make: Correction post (80–120 words) plus worked calculation.

RI.9-10.1 (opens in a new tab) W.9-10.2 (opens in a new tab) W.9-10.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.9-10.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.9-10.1.d (opens in a new tab)
Grades 11–12

Write a policy brief on how facilities requests should be prioritized in a district budget.

Students make: Policy brief, 450–550 words.

RI.11-12.1 (opens in a new tab) W.11-12.2 (opens in a new tab) W.11-12.5 (opens in a new tab) SL.11-12.1.c (opens in a new tab) SL.11-12.1.d (opens in a new tab)
College and community

Write a fact-check of the viral post for a local news site or a campus newspaper. Correct the comparison, show the math and say what the proposed budget can and cannot tell readers about the curtain.

Students make: Fact-check, 350–450 words, with a worked calculation.

Social studies (C3)
  • D2.Civ.4.6-8 Students explain the powers of local school boards compared with state and federal governments.
  • D2.Civ.11.9-12 Students evaluate how the budget process achieves or misses civic purposes.
  • D2.Civ.13.9-12 Students evaluate intended and unintended outcomes of how facilities money is allocated.
  • D4.8.9-12 Students apply democratic procedures by preparing a question for the board.
D2.Civ.4.6-8 (opens in a new tab) D2.Civ.11.9-12 (opens in a new tab) D2.Civ.13.9-12 (opens in a new tab) D4.8.9-12 (opens in a new tab)
What each standard means
RI.6.1
Use evidence from the text to support what it says directly and what you can infer from it.
W.6.2
Write an informative text that explains a topic by choosing, organizing and analyzing relevant information.
W.6.5
With help from peers and adults, strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing or rewriting.
SL.6.1.c
Ask and answer specific questions with details that add to the discussion.
SL.6.1.d
Review the main ideas of a discussion and show you understand other views by reflecting and paraphrasing.
RI.7.1
Use several pieces of evidence from the text to support what it says directly and what you can infer.
W.7.2
Write an informative text that explains a topic by choosing, organizing and analyzing relevant information.
W.7.5
With help from peers and adults, strengthen writing by planning and revising, focusing on purpose and audience.
SL.7.1.c
Ask questions that draw out more detail, and respond with relevant ideas that bring the discussion back on topic.
SL.7.1.d
Take in new information from others and change your view when the evidence calls for it.
RI.8.1
Use the evidence that most strongly supports your analysis of what a text says and implies.
W.8.2
Write an informative text that explains a topic by choosing, organizing and analyzing relevant information.
W.8.5
With help from peers and adults, strengthen writing by planning and revising, focusing on purpose and audience.
SL.8.1.c
Ask questions that connect several speakers’ ideas, and respond with relevant evidence and observations.
SL.8.1.d
Take in new information from others and qualify or defend your view based on the evidence.
RI.9-10.1
Support an analysis with solid, complete evidence from the text, both for what it states and for what it implies.
W.9-10.2
Write an explanatory text that presents complex ideas and information clearly and accurately.
W.9-10.5
Strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing or rewriting, focusing on what matters most for the purpose and audience.
SL.9-10.1.c
Move a discussion forward with questions that connect it to larger ideas, bring others in and test ideas and conclusions.
SL.9-10.1.d
Respond to different views, sum up where people agree and disagree, and adjust your view when the evidence calls for it.
RI.11-12.1
Back up an analysis with the strongest evidence from the text, including where the text leaves things uncertain.
W.11-12.2
Write an explanatory text that conveys complex ideas clearly and accurately.
W.11-12.5
Strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing or rewriting, focusing on what matters most for the purpose and audience.
SL.11-12.1.c
Keep a discussion moving with questions that probe reasoning and evidence, and make sure the full range of views is heard.
SL.11-12.1.d
Respond to different views, pull together what each side says, resolve conflicts where possible and name what still needs research.
D2.Civ.4.6-8
Explain the powers and limits of the branches of government, public officials and agencies at different levels.
D2.Civ.11.9-12
Evaluate how well different government decision-making procedures meet their civic purposes at each level.
D2.Civ.13.9-12
Evaluate public policies by their intended and unintended outcomes and consequences.
D4.8.9-12
Use deliberative and democratic strategies and procedures to make decisions and act at school and in the community.
Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric
AAC&U’s rubric for calculating, interpreting and explaining numbers in everyday situations. In this case: Students convert a district total to a per-pupil figure and explain why the units in the post do not match (Representation; Interpretation).
Information Literacy VALUE Rubric
AAC&U’s rubric for finding, evaluating and using information for a purpose, ethically and legally. In this case: Students check a viral post against the budget excerpt and the NCES page.
Written Communication VALUE Rubric
AAC&U’s rubric for writing that fits its context and purpose, develops its content and uses sources and evidence. In this case: Students write a fact-check for local readers that shows its evidence.
Information Creation as a Process
Information is made through a process, and how it was made affects what it can be trusted for. In this case: Students explain the difference between a proposed budget and an adopted one and why the stage changes what a figure means.

Plain wording is our paraphrase. The official text is at each link.

Course versions

Each course version changes what students read, make and show. The names are the official course names.

Open your course to see its task.

Honors (set by your school) 60 minutes

Task: Argue whether students should have a formal voice in school budget decisions.

Students make
Argument, 550–650 words.
Assess
The argument is judged on the workability of its structure and the seriousness of its counterargument, not on length.
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Reread Evidence A and C. Note what Dec can show and what he cannot.
  2. Read the participatory budgeting article your teacher gives you.
  3. Fill in the claim and counterclaim chart.
  4. Write a thesis that names a specific structure for student voice.
  5. Draft your thesis paragraph and counterargument paragraph on the Your draft page.
  6. Finish the argument, 550 to 650 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Thesis
Students should have a formal advisory role in budget hearings, but not a vote on the final budget.
The strongest objection
Students do not answer to voters and may lack budget knowledge, so a formal role could blur accountability.
What students would and would not control
Would: submit written questions and rank requests for spaces students use. Would not: vote on the adopted budget.

Sample draft: Thesis paragraph

Sample answer Honors (set by your school)

Dec pulls the theater curtain at every show, and it no longer closes. He has a photo and a $6,800 repair quote, but he does not know which line would pay for it or who ranks repairs. Students notice problems in spaces they use every day. Yet nothing in the budget excerpt shows how the board hears from students. Students should have a formal advisory role in budget hearings, 1 but not a vote on the final budget.

  1. Qualifies the thesis.

Sample draft: Counterargument paragraph

Sample answer Honors (set by your school)

1 The strongest objection is about expertise and accountability. Students do not answer to voters, and many have never read a budget. That concern is fair. An advisory role answers it, because it gives students a voice without a vote. 2 Students would submit written questions before adoption and rank requests for the spaces they use. Elected board members would still decide and still answer to voters. A structure like this keeps accountability where it is and adds evidence the board might not otherwise hear.

  1. Engages the counterargument seriously.
  2. Proposes a specific, workable structure.

Check your work questions

  1. Is your thesis clear and qualified?
  2. Do you use evidence from the case and the article?
  3. Do you answer the concern about expertise and accountability?
  4. Is your proposed structure specific and workable?
One change I made after feedback
I replaced a vague call for student voice with a specific advisory role, because my partner asked what students would control.

This case in the Honors (set by your school) educator edition

Open on screen Print this case
Pre-AP English 1 and Pre-AP English 2 45 minutes

Task: Closely read the budget excerpt’s labels, units and notes, then write an evidence-based explanation of what the $48 million figure can and cannot tell the theater crew.

Students make
Annotated excerpt plus explanation (200 words).
Assess
The annotated excerpt is checked for complete labels, and the explanation is scored for the limits of the total, a correct per-pupil calculation and a link to the curtain.
Course skills
Close observation and analysis, Evidence-based writing, Higher-order questioning.
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Annotate Evidence A: mark the year, stage, units and category of each figure.
  2. Calculate the per-pupil amount from the total and the enrollment.
  3. Compare your figure with the post in Evidence B.
  4. Talk with a partner about what the per-pupil figure proves.
  5. Write an explanation of about 200 words on the Your draft page.
  6. Finish with the curtain question the total cannot answer.

Sample answers for the task boxes

$48,000,000: year, stage, units
Next school year; proposed; total for the whole district
$310,000: year, stage, category
Next school year; proposed; building repairs at all schools
My calculation
$48,000,000 ÷ 3,200 = $15,000 per student
What the calculation changes
The units now match the post’s $21,000 per student. The year and stage may not.

Sample draft: Your explanation, about 200 words

Sample answer Pre-AP English 1 and Pre-AP English 2

The $48 million figure tells the theater crew less than it seems to. It is a proposed total for next school year, for the whole district. The note says figures may change before the board adopts the budget. 1 It is not money already spent. Divided by 3,200 projected students, 2 it comes to $15,000 per student. That puts it in the same unit as the post’s $21,000 for Westbrook, but 3 the post gives no year or stage for Westbrook. So the comparison is still not fair. The number that matters more for the crew is smaller. The budget sets aside $310,000 for building repairs at all schools. The total cannot tell the crew whether a stage curtain counts as a building repair, or how the district ranks the $6,800 request. 4 That is the question Dec should bring to the board.

  1. Uses the stage label correctly.
  2. Reports the calculation.
  3. Names a limit that the calculation does not fix.
  4. Connects the explanation to the curtain.

Check your work questions

  1. Did you label the year, stage and units?
  2. Does your explanation name a limit of the total?
  3. Is your calculation correct?
  4. Does it connect to the curtain question?
One change I made after my partner’s challenge
I removed my claim that we get less, because the post gives no year or stage for Westbrook.

This case in the Pre-AP English 1 and Pre-AP English 2 educator edition

Open on screen Print this case

Official course framework: College Board, Pre-AP shared principles and instructional practices (opens in a new tab)

AP English Language and Composition 50 minutes

Task: Write a synthesis argument: what should students bring to a school board budget hearing?

Students make
Synthesis essay, about 550 words, 40 minutes.
Assess
The draft receives practice feedback on the three AP Lang scoring rows, with a specific check on how accurately the visual source is used.
Course skills
Claims and Evidence (CLE), Reasoning and Organization (REO), Rhetorical Situation (RHS).
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Read the sources: Evidence A, the NCES summary, the curtain photo and Mari’s lines.
  2. Write a qualified thesis about what students should bring to a budget hearing.
  3. Note what each source can prove and what it cannot.
  4. Draft your thesis paragraph and your paragraph on the photo on the Your draft page.
  5. Finish the essay, about 550 words in 40 minutes, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
  6. Revise one paragraph so its commentary explains how the photo works on a board audience.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Thesis with a qualifier
Students should bring a labeled budget line, a priced need and a question, because a board can act on those more easily than on anger.
What each source can and cannot prove
Budget: the plan, not spending. NCES: the revenue mix, not this district. Photo: the tear, not its cause. Mari: checking labels first.

Sample draft: Thesis paragraph

Sample answer AP English Language and Composition

A school board hearing gives students a few minutes and a room full of competing requests. A post that set the district’s $48 million total beside a torn curtain asked readers to be angry, not to ask a question. 1 Students should bring three items instead: a labeled budget line, a priced need and a question the board can answer. Anger about a large number is easy to dismiss. A specific request is harder to set aside.

  1. States a defensible, qualified thesis.

Sample draft: Paragraph on the photo

Sample answer AP English Language and Composition

The photo of the torn curtain is the most persuasive source, and the easiest to misuse. It proves that the curtain is torn and no longer closes all the way. 1 It cannot prove why the curtain is still torn, or that money was spent somewhere else. Dec seems to know this limit, since he plans to bring the photo together with the quote and a question. For a board audience, the photo works best beside the $6,800 facilities quote. 2 Together they turn a complaint into a priced need that a member can find on a list.

  1. Treats the visual source accurately.
  2. Explains how the visual works on the audience.

Check your work questions

  1. Is your thesis defensible and qualified?
  2. Do you bring in at least three sources with commentary?
  3. Do you use the photo accurately?
  4. Do you explain what each source can and cannot prove?
How my revised commentary works on the board
It now says the photo plus the quote gives a member a priced item, not just a picture.

This case in the AP English Language and Composition educator edition

Open on screen Print this case

Official course framework: College Board, AP English Language and Composition course page (opens in a new tab)

AP United States Government and Politics 40 minutes

Task: Quantitative analysis: use the NCES revenue table (federal, state and local shares by state) to describe a pattern, and explain what it shows about fiscal federalism in education.

Students make
Quantitative analysis response (about 300 words).
Assess
Practice feedback follows the Quantitative Analysis format: accurate description with year and units, an identified pattern, a supported conclusion and a stated limit.
Course skills
Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy, Data Analysis, Concept Application.
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Read the table’s title, year and units before any number.
  2. Choose two states and record their federal, state and local revenue.
  3. Describe one pattern in the planner, with the year and units.
  4. Write a response of about 300 words on the Your draft page, in parts A to D.
  5. Explain what the pattern shows about fiscal federalism.
  6. Name one limit of the data for Dec’s curtain question.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Table title, year and units
Revenue sources for public schools by state, 2022–23. Dollars, with per-pupil amounts.
One pattern, with year and units
In 2022–23, the mix of federal, state and local revenue, in dollars, differs from state to state.
A limit of the data
A state-level share cannot show what one district spends on a stage curtain.

Sample draft: Your response, parts A to D

Sample answer AP United States Government and Politics

A. The NCES table reports revenue for public schools in each state 1 for the 2022–23 school year, in dollars, from federal, state and local sources. B. The pattern is variation: 2 the mix of federal, state and local revenue differs from state to state. C. 3 This pattern reflects fiscal federalism. The federal government adds money, often through categorical grants for specific purposes. States and local districts also raise revenue, in different mixes. Under local control, an elected school board adopts each district’s budget within state and federal rules. D. The data has a limit. 4 A state-level share cannot show what one district spends on facilities. Dec’s district proposes $310,000 for building repairs at all schools. No NCES table can tell him whether the $6,800 curtain is in that line, so he has to ask the board.

  1. Describes the data with its year and units.
  2. Identifies the pattern.
  3. Connects the pattern to a course concept.
  4. States a limit of the data.

Check your work questions

  1. Do you describe the data with its year and units?
  2. Do you identify a pattern?
  3. Do you explain fiscal federalism accurately?
  4. Do you state a limit of the data?
One change I made after feedback
I added the school year to part A, because my pattern had no date.

This case in the AP United States Government and Politics educator edition

Open on screen Print this case

Official course framework: College Board, AP United States Government and Politics course page (opens in a new tab)

AP Seminar 300 minutes

Task: Team inquiry: “How should school facility needs be prioritized fairly?” Members research equity vs. adequacy, capital planning, student voice and one district’s process, then present to a mock school board.

Students make
Individual research report (800–1,000 words) plus 8-minute team presentation.
Assess
Reports and the presentation are scored with educator-adapted rubrics modeled on the published Performance Task 1 components; this is practice, not a submitted performance task.
Course skills
Question and Explore, Evaluate Multiple Perspectives, Team, Transform, and Transmit.
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Write a team research question about ranking school facility needs fairly.
  2. Choose one lens: equity and adequacy, capital planning, student voice or one district’s process.
  3. Research your lens. Log each source in the tracker.
  4. Draft the criteria section of your report on the Your draft page.
  5. Finish the individual report, 800 to 1,000 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
  6. Test the team’s criteria on the $6,800 curtain request.
  7. Present to a mock school board for 8 minutes.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Team research question
How should a district rank school facility needs fairly when repair money is limited?
My lens
Equity and adequacy: whether repair money is shared fairly, and whether there is enough.
The curtain request under our criteria
$6,800 from a $310,000 line for all schools. Used every show. Safety risk unknown.

Sample draft: Criteria section of your report

Sample answer AP Seminar

Our team recommends 1 three published criteria for ranking facility requests. They are safety, how many students use the space and cost against the remaining repair line. 2 Each lens shaped one criterion. The equity and adequacy lens showed us that a fair share can still be too small. So the board should say when the repair line runs short. The capital planning lens led us to safety and use as the first tests. The student voice lens led us to ask students to report needs in the spaces they use every day. We tested the criteria on the theater curtain. The replacement costs $6,800, from a proposed line of $310,000 for building repairs at all schools. The curtain is used at every show, and no document shows a safety risk. 3 Under our criteria, it ranks in the middle. 4 The trade-off is that arts spaces with no safety risk may wait behind other repairs year after year.

  1. States the team’s criteria.
  2. Synthesizes the lenses instead of listing them.
  3. Tests the criteria on the case.
  4. Acknowledges who loses.

Check your work questions

  1. Is each lens researched accurately and cited?
  2. Do the criteria bring the lenses together?
  3. Did you test the criteria on the curtain request?
  4. Do you acknowledge the trade-offs?
One change I made after feedback
I linked each finding to a criterion, because my draft listed research without using it.

This case in the AP Seminar educator edition

Open on screen Print this case

Official course framework: College Board, AP Seminar course page (opens in a new tab)

Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program) 90 minutes

Task: Write a structured analysis of how the $48 million figure and the social post each work as arguments: what does each number select, hide and ask the reader to feel? Then give a two-minute talk on the question: when does a number clarify a public debate, and when does it hide a choice about values?

Students make
Structured analysis (400–500 words) plus a two-minute talk.
Assess
The educator applies the school’s own pre-IB rubric for accuracy, analysis and oral reasoning; no IB criteria, marks or grades are assigned.
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Fill in the grid for each number: unit, year, stage and what it leaves out.
  2. Mark what each number asks the reader to feel.
  3. Draft your analysis of the post and the total on the Your draft page.
  4. Finish the analysis, 400 to 500 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.
  5. Plan a two-minute talk: claim, example, counterexample.
  6. Give your talk on when a number clarifies and when it hides a choice.

Sample answers for the task boxes

$48 million: unit, year, stage, what it hides
Total, next year, proposed. Hides that it is a plan for every school.
$21,000: unit, year, stage, what it hides
Per student, year and stage unknown. Hides that its unit differs.
A number used fairly, and why
$6,800: one priced job, one unit, from the district’s facilities office.
Talk plan: claim, example, counterexample
Claim: labeled numbers clarify. Example: $15,000 per student. Counterexample: a labeled figure still hides a choice about need.

Sample draft: Your analysis, first part

Sample answer Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program)

The post and the budget both use numbers as arguments, and 1 each one selects some facts and hides others. The post sets “$48 MILLION” in capital letters beside Westbrook’s $21,000 per student. It selects the biggest number the district has. It hides that one figure is a total for every school, while the other is per student. The capital letters and the question “And they can’t fix ONE curtain??” 2 ask the reader to feel cheated. The budget excerpt works more quietly. Its $48,000,000 is labeled proposed, for next school year, with a note that figures may change. Those labels invite the reader to check before judging. A per-pupil calculation, $15,000 per student, answers the factual question of units. 3 It does not answer the value question. Whether $15,000 is enough depends on what students need and what a community expects its schools to provide. 4 The $6,800 quote is the fairest number in the case, because it prices one job in one unit.

  1. States the claim about numbers as arguments.
  2. Explains how the post frames the issue.
  3. Separates a factual question from a value question.
  4. Answers the challenge with a reason.

Check your work questions

  1. Do you handle every figure with its units and stage?
  2. Do you explain how each number frames the issue?
  3. Do you separate a factual question from a value question?
  4. Does your talk use a counterexample honestly?
One change I made after feedback
I added the stage label for $48 million, because my first draft called it spending.

This case in the Pre-IB (a school pathway, not an IB program) educator edition

Open on screen Print this case
IB Middle Years Programme (MYP) 90 minutes

Task: Investigate “How are school resources shared?” and create a visual comparing two districts fairly.

Students make
Visual plus 200-word explanation.
Assess
The educator uses Individuals and societies criteria B, C and D, applying the school’s own year-level descriptors.
Course skills
Individuals and Societies B: Investigating, Individuals and Societies D: Thinking critically, Individuals and Societies C: Communicating.
Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Write the statement of inquiry in the first planner box.
  2. Choose two district budget summaries from the same year and stage.
  3. Calculate a per-pupil amount for each district.
  4. Sketch a labeled chart in the planner, with units and years.
  5. Write a 200-word explanation on the Your draft page.
  6. Name one reason the comparison might still mislead.

Sample answers for the task boxes

Statement of inquiry
How funding systems divide resources shapes what students experience in each school, and fair comparisons require matching units, years and needs.
Chart plan: title, axis labels, units
Title: Proposed spending per student, same year. Y-axis: dollars per student. One bar for each district.
Fair-comparison check
Same year: yes. Same stage: yes. Units: dollars per student. Needs: unknown.

Sample draft: Your explanation, about 200 words

Sample answer IB Middle Years Programme (MYP)

My chart compares proposed spending per student in two districts from the same year. I started from the crew’s case. A post compared a district’s $48 million total with Westbrook’s $21,000 per student, 1 which mixes two units. Dividing $48,000,000 by 3,200 students gives $15,000 per student, so I used per-pupil amounts for both bars. 2 I also matched the year and the stage, because a proposed budget is a plan and an adopted budget is approved. 3 The comparison can still mislead. Two districts can spend the same per student and face different costs and needs. The NCES table shows that the mix of federal, state and local revenue differs from state to state. My statement of inquiry says fair comparisons need matching units, years and needs. My chart matches the first two. 4 It cannot show the third.

  1. Explains the problem the chart fixes.
  2. Shows the comparison is fair on units and years.
  3. Names a limitation.
  4. Connects the chart back to fairness and the statement of inquiry.

Check your work questions

  1. Do the units and years in your chart match?
  2. Is your chart accurate and labeled?
  3. Does your explanation name a limit?
  4. Does it connect the comparison to fairness?
One change I made after feedback
I added the year to my chart title, because a reader could not tell which budgets I used.

This case in the IB Middle Years Programme (MYP) educator edition

Open on screen Print this case

Official course framework: International Baccalaureate, MYP curriculum (opens in a new tab)

IB Diploma Programme: Global politics 100 minutes, partial fit

Task: Rehearse an engagement project on school funding: frame the political issue (who decides how facilities money is shared, and by what criteria), map the actors from the state legislature to the school board to student groups, plan an ethical way to engage a board member or budget office, and explain how power and legitimacy shape which requests get funded.

Students make
Engagement-project proposal, 500–700 words, with an actor map.
Assess
The educator gives practice feedback on issue framing, actor analysis and engagement planning; the proposal is not an internal assessment submission and no IB marks are predicted.
Course skills
Global politics — key concept: power.

Fit: partial. How a district divides resources raises power, legitimacy and equality, and a school-board budget process is a realistic engagement-project setting, but the case is a domestic local-finance question with no direct link to the thematic studies.

Steps and sample answers

Steps students follow

  1. Frame the political issue as one question in the planner.
  2. Map the actors: formal authority, resources, influence and voice.
  3. Find one date on your district’s budget calendar when the board hears the public.
  4. Plan one ethical engagement: who, how, what you will ask, consent and safety.
  5. Draft the issue and engagement sections on the Your draft page.
  6. Finish the proposal, 500 to 700 words, on lined paper or in the online workspace.

Sample answers for the task boxes

The political issue
Who decides how a district shares facilities money among schools, and by what criteria?
Actor map
State and federal rules: set limits. School board: adopts the budget. Facilities office: ranks repair requests. Theater crew and auditorium users: voice only.
My engagement plan
Email the board clerk to ask how students submit a written budget question. No recording without consent.

Sample draft: Issue section

Sample answer IB Diploma Programme: Global politics

This proposal examines who decides how a district shares facilities money, and by what criteria. The case begins with a torn theater curtain. The facilities office has priced a replacement at $6,800, and the district’s proposed budget sets $310,000 for building repairs at all schools. 2 The elected school board adopts the budget within state and federal rules, and the facilities office ranks repair requests. Students who use the auditorium have a voice but no formal authority. The political question is 1 how a request travels from people with voice to people with power.

  1. Frames the issue with the core concept of power.
  2. Places actors across levels of government accurately.

Sample draft: Engagement section

Sample answer IB Diploma Programme: Global politics

I will contact the school board clerk first, because the clerk is one of the people students can ask about the board. I will send a short email asking how students submit a written budget question and when the board hears requests before it adopts the budget. 1 I will not record any conversation without consent. I will not name any student or staff member in my report without permission. 2 This engagement tests legitimacy. Many students had no vote in electing the board. A budget may feel less legitimate to them unless the process lets them ask and receive an answer.

  1. Plans ethical engagement.
  2. Uses legitimacy precisely and answers the challenge.

Check your work questions

  1. Does your proposal frame a political issue about sharing public resources?
  2. Does your actor map cover each level of government accurately?
  3. Is your engagement plan ethical and feasible?
  4. Do you use power and legitimacy precisely?
One change I made after feedback
I added a consent step to my plan, because my draft planned to record a meeting.

This case in the IB Diploma Programme: Global politics educator edition

Open on screen Print this case

Official course framework: International Baccalaureate, Global politics course page (opens in a new tab)

Steps and sample answers for each course are in the educator edition for that course.

Not recommended for this case
IB Diploma Programme: Language A: language and literature
The case’s texts are a budget excerpt, a short social post and a repair quote, which call for numerical reasoning more than analysis of language and form; the post alone is too slight for sustained Paper 1 work.

Sources

Case sources

  1. ABC, “About Abbott Elementary (opens in a new tab).” No date listed. The show’s official description.
  2. National Center for Education Statistics, “Revenue sources for public schools by state, 2022–23 (Digest table 235.20) (opens in a new tab).” No date listed. Federal, state and local revenue for public schools in each state, with per-pupil amounts, for the 2022–23 school year.

Research behind the lesson

These are our teaching applications of the ideas below. For a rule or a fact, use the case sources.

  1. Robert M. Entman, 1993. Framing (opens in a new tab). Research article. What a message selects and emphasizes can shape how a problem, its causes and possible responses are understood. Keep in mind: Identifying a frame does not establish a speaker’s intent or prove how every audience member will respond.
  2. Carol Bacchi, No date listed. What’s the problem represented to be? (opens in a new tab) Author’s explanation of a policy-analysis approach. Examine the view of the problem built into a proposed solution, including its assumptions and omissions. Question your own proposal, too. Keep in mind: Our entry questions adapt part of WPR. They are not the complete approach or a substitute for evidence about an option’s effects.

Professional codes

  1. American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), ASPA Code of Ethics (opens in a new tab). Revised 2013. ASPA has promoted ethical standards for public servants since 1984.
  2. Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), SPJ Code of Ethics (opens in a new tab). Revised September 6, 2014, at SPJ's National Convention in Nashville, Tennessee.
  3. National Communication Association (NCA), Credo for Ethical Communication (opens in a new tab). Approved by the NCA Legislative Council in 1999; reaffirmed in 2011; reaffirmed with edits in 2017 and 2024.

Standards and course frameworks

  1. Common Core State Standards Initiative, English Language Arts Standards, Reading: Informational Text: grade 6 (opens in a new tab), grade 7 (opens in a new tab), grade 8 (opens in a new tab), grades 9–10 (opens in a new tab), grades 11–12 (opens in a new tab). Checked September 24, 2026.
  2. Common Core State Standards Initiative, English Language Arts Standards, Writing: grade 6 (opens in a new tab), grade 7 (opens in a new tab), grade 8 (opens in a new tab), grades 9–10 (opens in a new tab), grades 11–12 (opens in a new tab). Checked September 24, 2026.
  3. Common Core State Standards Initiative, English Language Arts Standards, Speaking and Listening: grade 6 (opens in a new tab), grade 7 (opens in a new tab), grade 8 (opens in a new tab), grades 9–10 (opens in a new tab), grades 11–12 (opens in a new tab). Checked September 24, 2026.
  4. National Council for the Social Studies, “College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework (opens in a new tab).” Checked September 25, 2026.
  5. College Board, Pre-AP shared principles and instructional practices (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
  6. College Board, AP English Language and Composition course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
  7. College Board, AP United States Government and Politics course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
  8. College Board, AP Seminar course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
  9. International Baccalaureate, MYP curriculum (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
  10. International Baccalaureate, Global politics course page (opens in a new tab). Checked September 25, 2026.
  11. American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), “VALUE Rubrics (opens in a new tab).” 2009. Checked September 25, 2026.
  12. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), a division of the American Library Association, “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (opens in a new tab).” 2016. Checked September 25, 2026.

Margin notes

  • Evidence to check
  • A question to ask
  • A rule or process
  • A next step

The companions are characters in the story. Their notes point to something to check or ask.

AP, Pre-AP and IB activities are practice designed by No, Pero Why?. They are not official College Board or IB materials. Honors expectations are set by your school. College tasks are practice designed by No, Pero Why?. They are not official materials from AAC&U, ACRL or any college, and no college has reviewed them. This guide gives general education, not legal advice.